![]() |
| | |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Arcade | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Welcome To Gnutella Forums You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! (click here) If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. Your email address must be legitimate and verified before becoming a full member of the forums. Please be sure to disable any spam filters you may have for our website, so that email messages can reach you. Once registered but before posting, members MUST READ the FORUM RULES (click here) and LimeWire/FrostWire users should include System details - help us to help you (click on blue link) in their posts if their problem relates to using the program. Whilst forum helpers are happy to help where they can, without these system details your post might be ignored. And wise to read How to create a New Thread Thank you Hilfe in Deutsch, Ayuda en español, Aide en français, Hulp in het Nederlands Forum Rules Support Forums Before you post to one of the specific Client Help and Support Conferences in Gnutella Client Forums please look through other threads and Stickies that may answer your questions. Most problems are not new. The Search function is most useful. Also the red Stickies have answers to the most commonly asked questions. (over 90 percent). If your problem is not resolved by a search of the forums, please take the next step and post in the appropriate forum. There are many members who will be glad to help. If you are new to the world of file sharing please do not be shy! Everyone was ‘new’ when they first started. When posting, please include details for: Your Operating System ....... Your version of your Gnutella Client ....... Your Internet connection (56K, Cable, DSL) ....... The exact error message, if one pops up Any other relevant information that you think may help ....... Try to make your post descriptive, specific, and clear so members can quickly and efficiently help you LimeWire and FrostWire users need to supply these details >>> System details - help us to help you (click on blue link) Moderators There are senior members on the forums who serve as Moderators. These volunteers keep the board organized and moving. Moderators are authorized to: (in order of increasing severity) Move posts to the correct forums. Many times, members post in the wrong forum. These off-topic posts may impede the normal operation of the forum. Edit posts. Moderators will edit posts that are offensive or break any of the House Rules. Delete posts. Posts that cannot be edited to comply with the House Rules will be deleted. Restrict members. This is one of the last punishments before a member is banned. Restrictions may include placing all new posts in a moderation queue or temporarily banning the offender. Ban members. The most severe punishment. Three or more moderators or administrators must agree to the ban for this action to occur. Banning is reserved for very severe offenses and members who, after many warnings, fail to comply with the House Rules. Banning is permanent. Bans cannot be removed by the moderators and probably won't be removed by the administration. The Rules 1. Warez, copyright violation, or any other illegal activity may NOT be linked or expressed in any form. Topics discussing techniques for violating these laws and messages containing locations of web sites or other servers hosting illegal content will be silently removed. Multiple offenses will result in consequences. 2. Spamming and excessive advertising will not be tolerated. 3. There will be no excessive use of profanity in any forum. 4. There will be no racial, ethnic, or gender based insults, or any other personal attacks. 5. Pictures may be attached to posts and signatures if they are not sexually explicit or offensive. 6. Remember to post in the correct forum. Take your time to look at other threads and see where your post will go. If your post is placed in the wrong forum it will be moved by a moderator. 7. If you see a post in the wrong forum or in violation of the House Rules, please contact a moderator via Private Message or the "Report this post to a moderator" link at the bottom of every post. Please do not respond directly to the member - a moderator will do what is required. 8. Any impersonation of a forum member in any mode of communication is strictly prohibited and will result in banning. 9. Multiple copies of the same post will not be tolerated. Post your question, comment, or complaint only once. There is no need to express yourself more than once. Duplicate posts will be deleted with little or no warning. 10. Posts should have descriptive subjects. Vague titles such as "Help!", "Why?", and the like may not get enough attention to the contents. 11. Do not divulge anyone's personal information in the forum, not even your own. This includes e-mail addresses, IP addresses, age, house address, and any other distinguishing information. Don´t use eMail addresses in your nick. 12. Signatures may be used as long as they are not offensive or sexually explicit. 13. Failure to show that you have read the forum rules may result in forum rules breach infraction points or warnings awarded against you which may later total up to an automatic temporary or permanent ban. Supplying system details is a prerequisite in most cases, particularly with connection or installation issues. Violation of any of these rules will bring consequences, determined on a case-by-case basis. Thank You! Thanks for taking the time to read these forum guidelines. We hope your visit is helpful and mutually beneficial to the entire community. |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| |||
| Greetings, we are about to test a new update distribution mechanism for LimeWire tonight. If you are running LimeWire 4.9.2 Beta or higher, please go to Options -> Updates and select "Beta Releases". Within the next 24 hours you may get a message prompting you to upgrade to 4.9.5. Let us know if you do, and how the upgrade went. Thanks a lot! P.S. beta 4.9.5 will also be available from the website, but please don't download it just yet - help us test this update thing at least for a day. Your patience is appreciated. Last edited by zab : July 18th, 2005 at 04:57 PM. |
| |||
| Do you remember if you restarted limewire anywhere between 6:30PM EST and the time you received the notification? We found a bug where the update only works if limewire hasn't been restarted. If you are feeling adventurous and want to help us test this out better here's what you can do: 1. Turn of "Connect on Startup" 2. Shut down LimeWire 3. delete the Documents and Settings\<user name>\.limewire\version.xml file 4. delete the Documents and Settings\<user name>\.limewire\.NetworkShare directory 5. start LimeWire, but don't connect yet - let it load all shared files 6. connect to the network. What should happen is LimeWire asking you to restart itself upgrading to a new version. Let us know if it works. Thanks for the help! Last edited by zab : July 19th, 2005 at 06:02 AM. |
| ||||
| actually, this is what i did lol: earlier today i was browsing around in options and noticed that i forgot to check the beta release box and did so. (this is how i also found the license bug i posted in the 4.9.3 beta topic) i didnt restart just yet untill a few hours later when i saw your post., but i never received the update message untill i restarted it. but anyways, this is what i have found after following your instructions: a new version.xml is saved with new version info upon connection. but does not display the prompt untill AFTER i restart it again. Quote:
it also sends me to the download page if i press update now (i didnt notice this before.): http://www.limewire.com/english/cont...ows+XP&osv=5.1 Last edited by ultracross : July 18th, 2005 at 11:38 PM. |
| |||
| Quote:
(the steps in the above post have been updated for anyone else wishing to try this)
__________________ The more you debug it, the more it bugs |
| ||||
| Just a thought: what about security and the in network updating? I've always been wary of upgrade notifications in the past on LW: what certifies you there is no false signal spreading letting you know that a real new version is available? I believe this is even more important in the new update schema: you could be induce to spread a LW version containing a trogan or any other worm/virus run by the LW installer following the in-network download? The old schema was redirecting you to the download adress, so you were sure of the source, what about now? Playing a bit of the devil's advocate right now, but a vulnaribility is the last thing LW needs right now, especially at the speed the in-network updates can spread in the LW subnet. Anyway, you guys probably found a technique to do it safely, but I feel bringing the possible issue could at least put the things clear. Merci
__________________ Liens d'intérêt /Links of interest: Gnutellaforums en français /The House's rules you have to respect / First search the forum, then create a thread / Free software alternatives! - Logiciels alternatifs gratuits!/ |
| |||
| The old update message as well as the new upgrade mechanism are protected using LimeWire's private key. They are, in fact, the same message - if you look at ~/.limewire/version.xml you will see that both the update URNs and the website URL are contained in the same document. |
| |||
| if you need a ?%&& any version yall could just go to &*?&* and you'll get everything there free and thats all i have to say i'm out. Spam and piracy talk are forbidden on this forum, read the forum rules. -et voilà Last edited by et voilà : July 20th, 2005 at 04:27 AM. |
| ||||
| umm, i would give it another try.. but i lost the 4.9.4 pro installer. i do have 4.9.5 pro, 4.9.3 pro and below. is there an archive of installers somewhere [of the basic version]? [brackets denote edit] Last edited by ultracross : July 20th, 2005 at 07:40 PM. |
| ||||
| When I opened Limewire Pro on two of my machines there was an alert at the bottom of my Limewire Screen telling me an update was available. I hit the alert, found the update, downloaded to Save, exited Limewire and installed the update. Nice, neat and clean.........no problems.........the advantage to having a fully functional and properly configured computer......Yes that is a poke at the others who blame LimeWire for their problems. LimeWire Update worked for me. |
| ||||
| Quote:
So don't worry from where that XML file comes from. If it validates, then it was created by LimeWire LLC itself, and nobody else, not even any LimeWire open source developers). The LimeWire will not display such update notice from any version XML file with the wrong signature, and will discard it if you attempt to modify it). See it like emails you receive from anywhere but that for which you can trust its origin as it contains a cryptographic signature. LimeWire has not, and will not reveal its own encryption private key needed to create or update that file. A non-LimeWire release created from the open sources would likely discard the Limewire notice or would embed the public key of the creator of that alternate release, instead of the LimeWire LCC public key, so that this alternate version can distribute its own version.xml file. (Note that version.xml is not purely a XML file: it just appears to have an XML content, but is followed by the cryptographic signature.) This security is based on the fact that if you can trust Limewire LLC to distribute the genuine version of Limewire that you are using, then you could trust Limewire LLC's signature used for its updates. The same technic is used in general by all software distributors as well (the public key is generally encapsulated within a public certificate, stored and validable in a trustable PKI provider, which acts as the escrow for attesting that the author's identity shown in the certificate has been verified and is not patently false; this PKI can also provide information about the status of a certificate, for example if it has been compromized, and can tell you if the certificate is still valid, or if it has been invalidated by its original author). Limewire can embed one or more public keys in each release: older ones (if they have not been compromized), and the most recent one. These public keys allow accepting update messages for all future versions that will be advertized and created using the corresponding private keys. If someone does not upgrade immediately, and several major versions have been released, may be sometime in the future, none of its embedded public key will match the update messages for these future versions, if they are not created using one of the private keys corresponding to the public keys embedded in an old distribution used by some user. It will take years before this happens, unless a private key has been compromized: * For example if the LimeWire LLC private key appears to have been stolen by someone to create a volontarily broken version of Limewire, something that has still never happened, * or if the cryptographically strong signature algorithm gets broken Limewire uses a signature based on the wellknown irreversible SHA-1 cryptographic digest algorithm, which is still still safe for now; Limewire could switch at any time to a even stronger algorithm such as SHA-256 or SHA-512 which is supported now natively in Java 1.4.1+. Would the strength of this digest be ever compromized, the whole planet would be largely informed because this encryption algorithm is constantly monitored by lots of security companies. Breaking this digest algorithm is still a very challenging and difficult problem worldwide, needing lots of costly resources. When this will occur, LimeWire would immediately change its signature, and would inform users on its web site that new update notifications will use a new key, and won't be delivered to users of old versions, that will have to update manually. No one can predict when such event will ever occur (those that would attempt to break the encryption algorithm would likely use their discovery fro more "profitable" criminal actions than just building a P2P servent, which can be freely downloaded from a wellknown source; if this ever happened, this forum would be filled with warning notices about fake and viral Limewire versions). These considerations are true for any software that embeds a internet update system, including Microsoft Update, antivirus updates, Java auto updates, and so on...
__________________ LimeWire is international. Help translate LimeWire to your own language. Visit: http://www.limewire.org/translate.shtml Last edited by verdyp : November 25th, 2005 at 03:42 PM. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
| | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| why is 3.8.1 labeled "beta" | sdsalsero | LimeWire Beta Archives | 1 | February 9th, 2004 12:10 PM |
| Turn Off "Verifying File" & "Saving File" | YoCraig | New Feature Requests | 8 | November 28th, 2003 04:05 PM |
| LimeWire Pro 3.6.10 Beta "Thumbs Up" | JPM1920 | General Mac Support | 0 | November 3rd, 2003 10:47 PM |
| Need Gnotella 1.0 Beta Testers | shaun | Gnotella (Windows) | 2 | July 20th, 2001 10:29 AM |