![]() |
| | |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Arcade | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| New Feature Requests Your idea for a cool new feature. Or, a LimeWire annoyance that has to get changed. |
|
Welcome to Gnutella Forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. Once registered but before posting, members MUST READ the FORUM RULES (click here) and LimeWire/FrostWire users should include System details - help us to help you (click on blue link) in their posts if their problem relates to using the program. Whilst forum helpers are happy to help where they can, without these system details your post might be ignored. And wise to read How to create a New Thread Thank you |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| |||
| Bad idea, right? But as long as other clients are doing this and these are catchwords that attract new users, gnutella should force the issue by adding support for the plugins that allow it. Let the other devs come to the GDF and complain, and maybe the truth and fair treatment will get more respect. I can guess that the evolution will be like the automatic queries. If something DOES work (like a merge between torrents and magnets perhaps?), all the better. If other networks can plunder gnutella with their 100:1 leeching, why not give gnutella users the "do unto others BETTER than they do unto you" opportunity. LW probably has already developed ways to add the plugins like giFT already developed, and shoild at least be allowed to "keep up" with the competition. eh? |
| ||||
| No. People on P2P forums are beginning to realize that multinetworks program sucks and usually have poor implementations of all the networks. Let LW continue to show leadership by not going crazy about a fool trend began by poisoned and shareaza. Let them not waste work on other half baked implementations and get real work done on gnutella. Other might try to catch up on the new gnutella technologies implemented in LW, but users will notice the difference even if some are not (there is a % of stupidity everywhere, it can't be avoided, look at morpheus supporters that come here). I'm personnally admiring innovators, not followers and imitators (original is often the best).
__________________ Liens d'intérêt /Links of interest: Gnutellaforums en français /The House's rules you have to respect / First search the forum, then create a thread / Free software alternatives! - Logiciels alternatifs gratuits!/ |
| |||
| Don't forget KCEasy, and recently, Kiwi. I hope you're right about others realizing how harmul multiple networks can be, though the discussion about LW 4 on Slyck --despite juggalo and Greg Bildson's efforts--shows that there is a long way to go. I hope filesharing is not at the same level of evolution as railroads: companies eventually agreed on track guage, but even today I suspect some areas still set their tracks so only their cars and locomotives can run Do you think there's a fair way to set the entry level for developers to access gnutella? If so, I'd ask for a feature request to "block Vendor." Right now I keep checking if a connected vendor supports Browse Host or has a >0 QRP. If not (repeatedly),and the messages I/O is high, I start itching to "block Vendor." . . . and if Dave doesn't start correcting his users whoi probably think he came up with the "What's New" and other devs, I'd start blocking ACQX too. ![]() |
| ||||
| Note that BitTorrent is not by itself a P2P network with search capability. You can't search in BitTorrent, you can just download from swarmed BitTorrent locations provided that you have a BitTorrent URL and that the initial BitTorrent source indicated in that URL is permanently accessible (on a true web server). BitTorrent is then a very useful system to help a website reduce its output bandwidth, by letting its downloaders becoming assisting mirrors for the web content. BitTorrent will be fantastic for contents that you can search in a central server that hosts tens of thousands of files, that are heavily replicated (I see a good application of BitTorrent for the distribution of free software, on websites like freshmeat.org or OSDN/SourceForge, if they can't upgrade to support more transfers at efficient transfer rates: it may become critical in some near future for these central servers to work with more and more broadband users that want to download at megabits/s speed). BitTorrent would be also fantastic for distributing streaming contents via HTTP (for example free radios on the web), without paying lots of money to very expensive CDNs (Content Delivery Networks). In the future, if there are good central servers with lots of contents where we could search for BitTorrent contents, it could be a good addition to LimeWire to add a component connecting to these servers (if they accept the workload for these searches). But for now, it's premature (unless we just integrate in LimeWire the BitTorrent client where you import an BitTorrent URL found on the web. The immediate need is not BitTorrent but a wider support of Magnets on web sites (Magnets are concurrent to BitTorrent, but can perform more things, as a Magnet can also be made to search in Gnutella).
__________________ LimeWire is international. Help translate LimeWire to your own language. Visit: http://www.limewire.org/translate.shtml Last edited by verdyp : May 22nd, 2004 at 05:24 PM. |
| ||||
| Ya P2P is filled with profitors and opportunists people. Dave of acquisition is one of them. I laught loud when I read the thread 109.2 that acquisition is a one man work. LOL
__________________ Liens d'intérêt /Links of interest: Gnutellaforums en français /The House's rules you have to respect / First search the forum, then create a thread / Free software alternatives! - Logiciels alternatifs gratuits!/ Last edited by et voilà : May 22nd, 2004 at 05:49 PM. |
| ||||
| LimeWire already fully supports bitprints since long for downloads, it now also supports THEX tree data for recovering files with corrupted sections (notably during swarmed downloads, a good point to defeat hackers trying to break the contents of some popular files with fake/bogous data inserted randomly within swarmed downloads)... Now with THEX trees, TigerTree Root hashes, and SHA1 content hashes, swarmed transfers are secured: you are sure to get a clean copy from popular downloads with many sources!
__________________ LimeWire is international. Help translate LimeWire to your own language. Visit: http://www.limewire.org/translate.shtml |
| |||
| Interesting. I tried some 'magnets' from here http://www.leeware.com/magnet.html (as discussed here ), and thought they didn't work because of some incompatibility. Would be nice if they did work. Which reminds me--I meant to request that I could create magnets from a multiple file selection in the library. In response to your earlier post about torrents, are there good reasons to not allow torrents to be used through LW? I recall the earliest posts in the mailing lists were about sharing bandwidth, much as you described with torrents. If this would take away dev time, I could see the argument against, but if they are easily 'ported' /integrated with the magnets--then they seem like a reasonable request. |
| ||||
| Quote:
Only thing really bugging me about it is, that he didn't GPL the interface-code, for GPLing it would have improved most OSX p2p-interfaces, I assume (while he'd necessarily have to stay ahead of the curve, but could use improvements by others...). Somehow I don't overly like pipelining.
__________________ -> put this banner into your own signature! <- -- Erst im Spiel lebt der Mensch. Nur ludantaj homoj vivas. GnuFU.net - Gnutella For Users Draketo.de - Shortstories, Poems, Music and strange Ideas. |
| ||||
| The bad thing about Acquisition, despite it is a good interface, is that its version numbers do not reflect the internal LimeWire core version number. If it said "Acquisition 109.2 (LimeWire 3.9.2)" it would be more clear. I don't know exactly which options of the Limewire core it supports. And I have no time to check its sources (is it open-sourced, as required by the LimeWire GPL licence?) I could say the same thing about "AcqLite" and "AquaLime", or for "FreeWire" (no more interest for it, users can get clean and free LimeWire Basic, and get real support for it with the original), that should offer a way to get the sources for EACH of their published version.
__________________ LimeWire is international. Help translate LimeWire to your own language. Visit: http://www.limewire.org/translate.shtml Last edited by verdyp : May 23rd, 2004 at 02:35 AM. |
| ||||
| Acquisition has its core open sourced, but not the interface (something bout pipelining making it unnecessary to open the interface-code) One bad move is, that it doesn't specify in the Venor-message, that it is Acquisition. The current version announces itself as "LimeWire/4.0.2".
__________________ -> put this banner into your own signature! <- -- Erst im Spiel lebt der Mensch. Nur ludantaj homoj vivas. GnuFU.net - Gnutella For Users Draketo.de - Shortstories, Poems, Music and strange Ideas. |
| ||||
| Quote:
Acqx su*cks!
__________________ Liens d'intérêt /Links of interest: Gnutellaforums en français /The House's rules you have to respect / First search the forum, then create a thread / Free software alternatives! - Logiciels alternatifs gratuits!/ |
| ||||
| I already asked him, if it was a bug. The answer was, that it is intentional. He didn't react to further questions about this. But You'll have to excuse me for quite liking Acquisition, as it still quite beats LimeWires usability. A LimeWire lite with only the most necessary features (or a Konfabulator-widget for which I posted the request in the LW-OSX-Board: Feature-Request: LimeWire as Konfabulator Widget ) would be likely to make me switch back. Problem is: I want a good working, sleek app, and Acq is that. I can for example "stream" mp3s over Gnutella with it via the preview-function (using iTunes) (as long as I get enough speed) with a single click. At the moment I mostly use LimeWire to create magnet-links. PS: I only found it out by chance as I tested, if Phex is able to connect to Acquisition through my dyndns-account (works) and just saw the LimeWire vendor-message, but at my dyndns-account and with my custom Acquisition port.
__________________ -> put this banner into your own signature! <- -- Erst im Spiel lebt der Mensch. Nur ludantaj homoj vivas. GnuFU.net - Gnutella For Users Draketo.de - Shortstories, Poems, Music and strange Ideas. |
| |||
| You shouldn't bother with ACQX and Dave's interpretation of the GPL. It makes you only feel anger and you risk to die of heart attack. It's only a matter of time until LimeWire's UI will catch up and will hopefully outrun ACQX in some way. Just lay back and enjoy the upcoming novelties and possibilities. An important decision was made last week but I cannot tell you more yet, sorry. BTW. Arne, Dave contacted me last week and he said he'll include the missing classes in the next release of the "Acquisition-Core" |
| ||||
| Now you got me excited Even the small changes I saw in the UI (new splash-screen for example) showed my, that I can expect LimeWire to get far more usable. Good to see, that you are now far enough with the network-code, that you can actually work on the interface again. 3kB/s network overhead for an ultrapeer sure is great!
__________________ -> put this banner into your own signature! <- -- Erst im Spiel lebt der Mensch. Nur ludantaj homoj vivas. GnuFU.net - Gnutella For Users Draketo.de - Shortstories, Poems, Music and strange Ideas. |
| ||||
| Rodger: I do not care a lot about Dave, it is just that some support him blindingly and spread some propaganda. He is like a few other dozen P2P "devs" that abuse gnutella and LW. I'm so happy LW clusters themselves and limit the dommage by not allowing many foreign vendors slots! There is a lot of knowledge to spread around to kill misinformation, and still many myths to kill
__________________ Liens d'intérêt /Links of interest: Gnutellaforums en français /The House's rules you have to respect / First search the forum, then create a thread / Free software alternatives! - Logiciels alternatifs gratuits!/ |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
| | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Lime wire support??? What support? | ticked | Open Discussion topics | 2 | May 15th, 2007 03:13 PM |
| Torrents | donp1371 | Open Discussion topics | 21 | November 12th, 2006 08:20 AM |
| linux specific fixes - amaroK support, better looking themes, and XGL/COMPIZ support | baldy1324 | New Feature Requests | 0 | May 25th, 2006 02:12 PM |
| Support for more networks | mxpxsumblink4182 | New Feature Requests | 13 | May 11th, 2004 05:48 AM |
| Private networks vs Open networks | cheekybuddha | Open Discussion topics | 0 | October 12th, 2001 10:09 AM |