![]() |
| | |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Arcade | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| New Feature Requests Your idea for a cool new feature. Or, a LimeWire annoyance that has to get changed. |
|
Welcome to Gnutella Forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. Once registered but before posting, members MUST READ the FORUM RULES (click here) and LimeWire/FrostWire users should include System details - help us to help you (click on blue link) in their posts if their problem relates to using the program. Whilst forum helpers are happy to help where they can, without these system details your post might be ignored. And wise to read How to create a New Thread Thank you |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| |||
| I have an idea to make the network a much better structured and uniformed network. As i see it, meta/id3 tags and filenames are always screwed up. Your searching with limewire is sometimes frustrating because someone renamed something, messed with meta data or messed with the file itself. So what can we do? Thats a question that i would like to try to answer. An outside agent seperate from limewire and gnutella exists, there might be more than one, but its the only one im aware of and the a lookup feature for it already exists in limewire. Its name of the site is called bitzi. Limewire should get with the bitzi web lookup (or a site that does something similar) and limewire would integrate a better and a completely autimated way of fixing meta data and file names with the bitprint. Have this as an optional component that can be turned on/off. Im sure that this can be done and it would structure and uniform the network and make it nearly the best, if not the best already it would give it a significant boost. It would give a definate advantage for all parties involved: limewire, gnutella network, and the users. Please post any questions, comments concerns, addons and information you may have. I would really like this to be a collaboritive effort and to get it going. |
| |||
| http://www.gracenote.com/ ^ limewire can become a participant in this please post your thoughts about this dev team |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
| | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Accessing own network but not Gnutella network | w_loun | General Gnutella Development Discussion | 5 | February 27th, 2004 02:44 PM |
| Accessing own network but not Gnutella network | w_loun | Gtk-Gnutella (Linux/Unix) | 1 | February 24th, 2004 06:38 PM |
| Uniformity of Labeling | brahalfoff | New Feature Requests | 0 | October 24th, 2003 09:42 PM |
| network connection erroe. re-configure network settings? | mcdted | Support: General | 3 | October 4th, 2001 12:12 AM |