Gnutella Forums

Gnutella Forums (https://www.gnutellaforums.com/)
-   Chat - Open Topics - The Lounge (https://www.gnutellaforums.com/chat-open-topics-lounge/)
-   -   Question About Child Porn? (https://www.gnutellaforums.com/chat-open-topics-lounge/41096-question-about-child-porn.html)

StudMufinn July 14th, 2005 03:04 PM

Question About Child Porn?
 
How do you report someone?
And whom do you report them to?

I am getting tired of downloading a movie file that has no keywords indicating its illegal porn only to preview it and to find that’s its child porn!!

I don’t want to here any crap about "Someone’s Freedoms"
No one has a right to obtain child porn.

Any one who defends the right to obtain child porn,
Well, then you must have a lot of it.

I can’t wait to see what kind of response I get to this post.

The Shall Be Light July 14th, 2005 03:38 PM

Here's mine: Blah blah blah. FOAD.

cathodraytube July 14th, 2005 06:08 PM

im getting tired of sead problem too.....AND all the other garbage out there....128kmp3s, virruses, sponsored results, hit genorators, ads, videos that are so compressed that your eyes bleed if you try to watch them for more than 30seconds,animal porn, corrupted files that dont work etc. and the thing that ****** me off the most is lossless music files made from lossy files like 128kmp3s.


PS , what dose he meen by "blah blah blah FOAD" ?? dose it meen that he just dosent care about this subject , or that he approves of CP???

cathodraytube July 14th, 2005 08:54 PM

no i dont belive iv ever herd the term "FOAD"......

masterjung July 26th, 2005 08:32 AM

I strongly disagree
 
" NO ONE" SHOULD HAVE THEIR "RIGHT TO DOWNLOAD CHILD PORN" TAKEN AWAY FROM THEM. WE JUST NEED TO FIND OUT WHO THE DOWNLOADERS AND CREATORS ARE, AND HAVE THEM RAPED BY BEARS AND SHOT!!!!!!!!!SHOT.SHOT.SHOT.SHOT.SHOT.SHOT.SHOT.SH OT.SHOT.SHOT.SHOT.SHOT.SHOT.SHOT. THEN, BLOWN UP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!BLOWN UP. BLOWN UP. BLOWN UP.!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Wild Peach July 26th, 2005 09:15 PM

Okay, Peerless, don't bite my head off or anything, just a friendly, hypothetical discussion here, but are you saying that people who watch (and I am by NO means defending the actions of people who do) are pedophiles? Or just the warts on the butt of society that need to be surgically removed? I would hate to seem to be on their side, but unfortunately, their rights are protected by the First Amendment in the US at least, and if we were to deny them that right, then the movies, cd's, etc. that you enjoy could be deemed unacceptable and your right to view such material would be restricted. Who would determine the criteria and govern such decisions? It's a fine line we all walk and I agree with you totally, people who watch and enjoy kiddie porn are not working on all cylinders, hangin's too good for 'em, burnin's too good for 'em, they should be torn into itty bitty pieces and buried alive as far as I'm concerned, but legally, they do have that right, as abhorrant and disgusting the thought may be.

So, let me have it and be gentle with me, okay? LOL!

ukbobboy01 July 26th, 2005 10:15 PM

KP
 
Dear Wild Peach & Peerless

This hypothetical discussion you are having about first amendments rights is interesting for US citizens but we in the UK have no such rights, KP is illegal and that is that. Anyone caught with it, in physical form (pictures) or electronic (on computer) will be prosecuted, no "ifs" or "buts".

However, I think you guys miss a very important point, KP is not like ordinary porn, that is produced by an amateur or professional industry, KP is made within families or, to put it another way, KP is the filming of child abuse within dysfunctional families.

How you go about stopping child abuse is another subject but if you could you would effectively kill off KP.

So, I do not believe KP is about the rights of the individual it should be about the rights of a child to be a child.



UK Bob

ukbobboy01 July 28th, 2005 12:52 AM

KP (again)
 
Peerless

I take it that NAMBLA is purely a US pressure group because I do not believe it exist in the UK.

I do agree with you that KP should not exist and that it is way outside of what any reasonable person would include as "rights".

But KP exist because abuse within the family exist and, to broaden the subject, child abuse also exist within the "care" system, i.e. churches, orphanages, foster homes and anywhere else a few “so called” adults hold enormous power over children.

That is where KP comes from and that is where it should be stopped.



UK Bob

Wild Peach July 30th, 2005 08:30 AM

Peerless:

I love the compassion that you show for the children of this world, it shows that you truly have a good and genuine heart, however, most abusers have been abused at some point in their lives and I don't know, maybe their behavior can be reversed, but what they need is help. Like I said, I agree with you, they're sub-humans, at this particular point in their lives, but you've got to believe in the power of redemption. I personally don't think that kind of material should be available here, but the ultimate remedy for that is not to view it at all. If we all feel that way, then the material would theoretically disappear, because without demand, there's no need for supply. But it's apparent that SOMEONE'S watching it and until we rid the forum and the world for that matter, this will never stop. Pedophiles have been on the Earth since time eternal, maybe we shoulld let a higher power take care of justice.

One Love,

Wild Peach

ukbobboy01 July 30th, 2005 10:15 AM

Child Abuse/Pornography
 
Dear Wild Peach

I agree with your sentiment but, I'm afraid, that is all it is, you said:
Quote:

Pedophiles have been on the Earth since time eternal
This is an important point because KP is the filming of child abuse, which has been around forever. As long as there is child abuse there will always be someone to film it. But if we can stop child abuse, child solders, child prostitution, etc. KP will then stop.

Not knowing about the horrible things in the world will not make them stop, which is what you are suggesting, tackling the root problem is the only solution.



UK Bob

Grandpa July 30th, 2005 09:25 PM

I must say I admire you all and your stand on the subject. But Peerless what about the 18 year old kid that does somthing consentiual with a 17 year old kid. The 17 year old kids parents finds out and sends the child to a psychologist. The 17 year old then tells the psychologist what happend. Now in the U.S. the psychologist is bound by law to report it to the authorties wearas the 18 year old is an adult and the 17 year old is a child. So if we used your solution the 18 year old would be sent away forever. Now don't get me wrong. I think that KP and child abuse is well, there really aren't any words to discribe how bad I think it is. Any way I do not look down on StudMuffin for wanting to report it and actually admire them in a way for it. Because if we all had the balls to report such things we would probally have a better chance of ending KP,Child Abuse, etc.

Later Grandpa

Grandpa July 30th, 2005 10:54 PM

What you say is true but the way the law is it is the same thing. And I completley agre with your solution except for who determins what is what, where and how do you draw that line. Believe me I myself raised 2 daughters and as my name applies I have several grandchildren 5 at this time and hopefully more to come. And I do not look forward to the posibilty of any of this crap happening to them but due to the current laws allot of these offinders are set free. But on the otherhand I would hate to see a person in the scenario described before spend the rest of there life put away somewhere. Due to my liberal views myself and people like me are proball partially if not holey to blamb for the currret legal system which lets these people out.

Later Grandpa

Wild Peach July 31st, 2005 09:25 AM

I think that we all are in agreement that KP is a sick, twisted practice, that it has no place in society, and all the other very valid points brought up here, however, the only thing we can do right here, right now, is to make sure we keep it out of our happy little haven we've found here. No one can do everything, but everyone can do something and if we take the small step of trying to remove it from the network (now, how we'll do that I have no idea!), maybe we can make this corner of the world a better place.

stantheman July 31st, 2005 07:23 PM

i love this dam country but screwed up people that do stuff like this **** the crap out of me. All you hippy dippy folks out there who are gonna sit there and defend crap like this need to be thoroughly beaten with a 2x4. that is all. oh yeah, that's f***ing gross.

in response to the 17 and 18 year old question, i'm 19 and my ex-girlfriend was 17. we did some naughty stuff but that doesn't mean i should be locked up. she was "a consenting partner"

zbucket July 31st, 2005 11:02 PM

Don't know how it is in the US or Uk, but in Aus we have a fairly straight forward law that deals with the 17 yo 18 yo problem.

If the child is sixteen or seventeen the age difference is allowed to be a maximum of four years, under sixteen it is two. The age of legal consent is still 16 but if a 17 yo and a 15 yo get at it, the 17 yo can't be charged with statutory rape, but an 18 yo can.

I think I just made a straight forward law bloody confusing!

ukbobboy01 August 1st, 2005 12:17 AM

Australian Law
 
Zbucket

If your Aussie law is as you say it is then I think it is the best of the bunch.

In the UK, the legal age of consent is 16, so if a 16-year-old boy has sex with a 15-year-old girl then it is statutory rape. If it is the other way around, i.e. 16 yo girl and 15 yo boy then the girl could be charged with sexual assault. British law does not recognise that a woman can commit rape (although rare, there have been documented cases were older women have forced their attentions on teenage boys). And finally, if both participants are under 16 then the onus is on the boy.

With this kind of mess I think the Australians got it right.




UK Bob

Wild Peach August 1st, 2005 07:19 AM

But this isn't about consenting teeenager with raging hormones, this is about children who are being victimized physically and/or mentally by adults for sexual purposes. Hell, I was a mother at 15, so I know about consent and the law (this was in the US in 1978, talk about mad drama!) and I had to marry the guy to keep him out of jail! the marriage didn't last long and the best thing to come out of it was my daughter, but that's a whole 'nother story! In my personal opinion, I'm with UK Bob, the Aussies have got that one right, but it's hard to place an age limit on who's ready and who's not, because we all don't become "mentally aware" at the same time or have a bell that rings to tell us it's time...

What I thought we were talking about was the sexual predators that victimize and damage the children of this world and are supported (and maybe even attacked) by those who watch KP. To me, there's not much difference between those that watch it and tose that produce it, you're just on different sides of the chain, but you're on the same chain...

ukbobboy01 August 1st, 2005 09:04 AM

Hi Wild Peach

The welcome diversion, introduced by Zbucket and continued by by myself, came as a relief to a very tough and disturbing topic.

I think we can agree that we are all on the same page, as far as KP is concerned, but putting our strong emotions to one side for a moment I think we basically disagree on how to tackle the problem.

However, reporting it to the authorities is a good start.



UK Bob

Wild Peach August 1st, 2005 09:22 AM

No doubt, UK Bob, no doubt....as you probably can tell, I was on the debate team in my younger years! It's an interesting subject and everyone has brought very valid points to the table, no harm intended, just wanted to keep the party goin', so to speak! I'll take my cue and bow out gracefully....

cathodraytube August 1st, 2005 10:17 PM

damn thats a lot of reading.....

*eyes hurt*

anyway heres my 2 cents...

i think KP is indeed horribul and i dont know how any of you can think that anybody has the right to produce/watch/look at it.

i think if a 17yo and a 18yo have consentual sex it is in no way rape ,same with a 17 and a 19 or a 15 and 16 or 16 and 14 as long as it is consentual. but if one of the people forces the other , its rape and the person who was doing the forcing should be prosocuted.

if a 15yo girl and a 16 yo boy have consentual sex, tape it , and share the tape on the internet ,i dont see that as KP.

if a 30yo man rapes a 15yo girl,tapes it ,shares it on the net , that is definantley kp and is discusting and whoever made it needs to be killed....

cathodraytube August 2nd, 2005 10:44 PM

you meen to tell me they have little kids under 10 involved in this crap??? teenagers are one thing but little kids??

OMG that truley is horribul.

cool22 August 3rd, 2005 01:41 AM

lol
 
to peerless that is awesome FOAD u rule for that. to the guy above me who said something about NAMBLA i saw that on southpark that is awesome

cool22 August 3rd, 2005 01:42 AM

lol
 
has anyone thoguht of micheel jaskson when this was posted

cool22 August 3rd, 2005 01:49 AM

well if the kid says daddy daddy i wanna be in a porno i think that should be aloud if they are over 13

Grandpa August 6th, 2005 11:28 AM

I hope you are not a father

cathodraytube August 15th, 2005 10:35 PM

why dont you go sadomize your toaster while your standing in the shower...


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:37 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.

Copyright © 2020 Gnutella Forums.
All Rights Reserved.