June 22nd, 2002
|
| Gnutella Aficionado | | Join Date: March 13th, 2002 Location: Aachen
Posts: 832
| |
 Re: Protocol Specifications and Actual implementations
Quote:
I wish to know which specifications of the RFC-gnutella protocol draft are acomplished by the diferents servants (gnucleus, limeware, etc).
Specifically, which of the proposals like QRP, Ultraper, HUGE, XMP Metadata are implemented.
And more specifically how QRP, and HUGE and Metadata relate each other (Hash tables policys etc).
| LimeWire implemented HUGE (v2.5+), QRP/Ultrapeers (v1.9+), Metadata (no idea when), GGEP (2.5+). 2.5 is not released yet.
Bearshare implemented initial HUGE support in v2.6, QRP in v3.0 (still beta).
Gnucleus implemented initial HUGE support (I don't know when), QRP in v1.8.
This is no secret, I can only suggest (as Mike already did) that you search through the GDF archives if you are looking for more specific answers - or ask around in the clients forums.
The official gnucleus forum is at www.gnucleus.net
The official Bearshare forum is at www.bearshare.net
The official LimeWire forum is here
You've always a good chance of getting a reply of the Bearshare/Gnucleus developers. The LimeWire developers don't come here very often. You'll probably have to deal with some LimeWire zealots trolling in the LimeWire forums (my opinion is, that you gotta be completely out of your mind to use that damned LimeWire crap).  |
Similar Threads 
Threaded Mode
