![]() |
|
Register | FAQ | The Twelve Commandments | Members List | Calendar | Arcade | Find the Best VPN | Today's Posts | Search |
General Gnutella Development Discussion For general discussion about Gnutella development. |
![]() |
| LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
| |||
![]() A peer can already do this. All it takes is to buffer up several packets before doing a write to the socket (as was pointed out Nagle will do this already to a certain extent too). Output buffering is generally a good practice - it's also simpler and doesn't require changes to the protocol. In general it's a bad idea for the application level protocol to make any assumptions about the lower level network protocol. There's no telling what the smallest MTU may be between you and another peer - packets may be fragmented, recombined or compressed at any point along the journey. Because of fragmentation, you might actually cause more packets to be sent. |
![]() |
| |
![]() | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[0.7 proposal] Count search replies | arne_bab | General Gnutella Development Discussion | 5 | November 8th, 2002 09:04 AM |
Gnutella Protocoll v0.7 Proposal | Moak | General Gnutella Development Discussion | 41 | August 17th, 2002 10:55 AM |
Proposal for development of Gnutella (hashs) | Unregistered | General Gnutella Development Discussion | 61 | April 17th, 2002 08:35 AM |
My Proposal for XoloX!!! | Unregistered | User Experience | 1 | February 6th, 2002 08:11 AM |
---a Radical Proposal--- | Unregistered | General Gnutella / Gnutella Network Discussion | 0 | September 21st, 2001 12:08 PM |