Gnutella Forums  

Go Back   Gnutella Forums > Gnutella News and Gnutelliums Forums > General Gnutella Development Discussion
Register FAQ The Twelve Commandments Members List Calendar Arcade Find the Best VPN Today's Posts

General Gnutella Development Discussion For general discussion about Gnutella development.


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11 (permalink)  
Old January 28th, 2002
Moak's Avatar
Guest
 
Join Date: September 7th, 2001
Location: Europe
Posts: 816
Moak is flying high
Default

I have a very different sight of the_GDF and their role.

Basically it's one valuable source of knowledge beyond others. I take the their proposals as proposals, which means I try to understand and improve what could be done better fom my programming knowledge and point of view. If ppl don't like it, fine, but discussing should be still allowed here. Some months back (before Mike Green cleaned up the chaos), the GDF was very chaotic and sometimes discussing things dead until they didn't move anymore. We gained no improvement in network topology or for the endusers for months, other P2P systems where much more innovative and gained more users every week. Currently the GDF is more attractive, I wonder positive, great for Gnutella! But I still see LW and BS implementing things, make it a "defacto standard" and come with a "eat or die" mentalaty. I still see the GDF hiding with a lack of documentation for new coders who would like to contribute or to program a client that follows the best available Gnutella technology. With this high society behaviour, it is easy to say... oh you are bad for "the network" b/c you don't follow our rules. About votes from important developers -which developers- we have only 4-5 clients in active development. So I don't see a large active balanced developers community, compared to other open source places. The invisble pushing force is LW and BS = commercial interests (Note: For exmaple I see the name "ultrapeer" as marketing, but well some say it's because FT's supernode sounds so close... do we name hashs ultrahashs or smarthashs soon?). Finding an end, the GDF was thought for a forum of coordination between developers: but I think promotion of new concepts and new coders is behind implementation question inside the GDF. Implementation isn't everything, the GDF will not take you serious until you coded an(other) client?

I feel uncomfortable with your description of wish-they-were developers forum here. I and others spend a lot free time in writing articles and helping new Gnutella programmers + bringing new ideas and concepts to Gnutella. I don't want to turn Gnutella into FastTrack, eDonkey... but I get inspired from all, not only from the GDF.
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Gnutella Protocoll v0.7 Proposal Moak General Gnutella Development Discussion 41 August 17th, 2002 10:55 AM
gnutella development plans Iamnacho General Gnutella Development Discussion 11 March 9th, 2002 06:21 PM
My Proposal for XoloX!!! Unregistered User Experience 1 February 6th, 2002 08:11 AM
Xolox and Gnutella development Moak Rants 6 November 25th, 2001 06:05 AM
---a Radical Proposal--- Unregistered General Gnutella / Gnutella Network Discussion 0 September 21st, 2001 12:08 PM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:48 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.

Copyright © 2020 Gnutella Forums.
All Rights Reserved.