Gnutella Forums

Gnutella Forums (https://www.gnutellaforums.com/)
-   General Gnutella / Gnutella Network Discussion (https://www.gnutellaforums.com/general-gnutella-gnutella-network-discussion/)
-   -   Which Client is Most Popular? (https://www.gnutellaforums.com/general-gnutella-gnutella-network-discussion/2432-client-most-popular.html)

zeroshadow July 14th, 2001 09:49 PM

Which Client is Most Popular?
 
From what I uploaded over the last few days here are the clients that people used.

At 12 GBytes.

BearShare 65.12%
LimeWire 18.54%
Gnucleus 5.57%
MyNapster 4.22%
Gnotella 4.03%
PHEX 1.91%
Other* 0.61%

----------------------------------

At 18.5 GBytes.

BearShare 60.54%
LimeWire 18.98%
Gnotella 9.90%
Gnucleus 5.37%
MyNapster 2.90%
PHEX 1.26%
Other* 1.05%

----------------------------------

At 24.6 GBytes uploaded and 10,900 Files uploaded.

BearShare 64.92%
LimeWire 17.37%
Gnotella 8.47%
Gnucleus 4.83%
MyNapster 2.52%
Other* 0.95%
PHEX 0.94%

----------------------------------

At:
35 GBytes uploaded
14,329 Files uploaded
3,719 Unique IP addresses uploaded to

BearShare 61.58%
LimeWire 21.67%
Gnotella 7.92%
Gnucleus 4.42%
MyNapster 2.35%
Other* 1.17%
PHEX 0.89%

----------------------------------

At:
49 GBytes uploaded
18,124 Files uploaded
4,667 Unique IP addresses uploaded to

BearShare 62.12%
LimeWire 17.17%
Gnucleus 11.89%
Gnotella 5.72%
MyNapster 1.69%
Other* 0.84%
PHEX 0.57%

*clients unable to identify

Kirby July 15th, 2001 02:38 PM

Re: Which Client is Most Popular?
 
--
I'm sure you're smiling about BearShare having the most uploads, the only reason is that the only other client who even has a speck worth using of your QHD crap compatability is LimeWire. Maybe that's why it's second. (And also why Gnucleus is such a far third.)
Maybe QHD would work if there was compatibility for it

Kirby
[IMG]http://**************.com/ms/kirbykore/images/kirbywave.gif[/IMG]

zeroshadow July 15th, 2001 05:38 PM

:D I :D am :D not :D smiling :D

What are you talking about? There was only 0.61% that were not compatible enough to be identified. :rolleyes:

The biggest error would be that the data only came from one location over the space of a few days.

zeroshadow July 15th, 2001 05:49 PM

Moved this post info to the top one, so it would be easier to see.

Kirby July 16th, 2001 11:47 AM

Let's look at this
 
Quote:

Originally posted by zeroshadow
:D I :D am :D not :D smiling :D

What are you talking about? There was only 0.61% that were not compatible enough to be identified. :rolleyes:

The biggest error would be that the data only came from one location over the space of a few days.

--
>The biggest error would be that the data only came from one location over the space of a few days.
So, from what I see, one IP downloaded 18.5 gigs of stuff from you. Most of the time he uses Bearshare, but he also uses LimeWire and some others.
Wait, misunderstanding. So what you're saying is that there were different IPs. But just a small half the time, it was one IP. (Who was using BearShare, no doubt.)
>What are you talking about? There was only 0.61% that were not compatible enough to be identified. :rolleyes:
Yes, I did say that wrong. But the way you say it, you act like everything can be IDed 100% of the time, which is, needless to say, stupid.


Kirby
[IMG]http://**************.com/ms/kirbykore/images/kirbywave.gif[/IMG]

zeroshadow July 16th, 2001 03:53 PM

Sorry
 
Sorry I didn't think that it would be that hard for you to understand.

>>The biggest error would be that the data only came from one location over the space of a few days.
>So, from what I see, one IP downloaded 18.5 gigs of stuff from you. Most of the time he uses Bearshare, but he also uses LimeWire and some others.
Wait, misunderstanding. So what you're saying is that there were different IPs. But just a small half the time, it was one IP. (Who was using BearShare, no doubt.)

1. You have got it backwards the "one location" is me the one uploader, not one downloader.
2. The "data" is not the "18.5 gigs" that I uploaded, it is the data that I collected about those people that downloaded from me, i.e. what client & version they were using, what country, IP, host, time of day, etc.

>>What are you talking about? There was only 0.61% that were not compatible enough to be identified.
>Yes, I did say that wrong. But the way you say it, you act like everything can be IDed 100% of the time, which is, needless to say, stupid.

1. Sorry, next time I won't abbreviate. "Other" in my list means: Other clients unable to identify.

dbl_221 July 16th, 2001 07:50 PM

I tried Bearshare but it kept crashing my router/firewall. Also I have been trying to avoid java so no Limewire for me (so I'm Javaphobic sue me).

I have been using Gnucleus for several days now and it is far more sophisticated and most importantly....it does not crash my router.

:D Gnucleus kicks ***

zeroshadow July 17th, 2001 07:15 AM

Ya, Gnucleus is a good one. I still use it a lot.

zeroshadow July 17th, 2001 07:17 AM

Moved this post info to the top one, so it would be easier to see.

Kirby July 17th, 2001 09:00 AM

Re: Sorry
 
Quote:

Originally posted by zeroshadow
Sorry I didn't think that it would be that hard for you to understand.

>>The biggest error would be that the data only came from one location over the space of a few days.
>So, from what I see, one IP downloaded 18.5 gigs of stuff from you. Most of the time he uses Bearshare, but he also uses LimeWire and some others.
Wait, misunderstanding. So what you're saying is that there were different IPs. But just a small half the time, it was one IP. (Who was using BearShare, no doubt.)

1. You have got it backwards the "one location" is me the one uploader, not one downloader.
2. The "data" is not the "18.5 gigs" that I uploaded, it is the data that I collected about those people that downloaded from me, i.e. what client & version they were using, what country, IP, host, time of day, etc.

>>What are you talking about? There was only 0.61% that were not compatible enough to be identified.
>Yes, I did say that wrong. But the way you say it, you act like everything can be IDed 100% of the time, which is, needless to say, stupid.

1. Sorry, next time I won't abbreviate. "Other" in my list means: Other clients unable to identify.

--
>1. You have got it backwards* the "one location" is me the one uploader, not one downloader.
So, basically, most of it was you downloading files using BearShare.
Also, are clear on what "upload" and "download" mean? Because if you keep saying "downloading from me", you're liable to confuse a lot of people.

Kirby
[IMG]http://**************.com/ms/kirbykore/images/kirbywave.gif[/IMG]

*Actually, you're the one who originally had it backwards, I misiinterpreted it because you don't know the difference between an upload and a download. (Well, you know what they are, you just never use them in the right places.)


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:07 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.

Copyright © 2020 Gnutella Forums.
All Rights Reserved.