![]() |
| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | The Twelve Commandments | Members List | Calendar | Arcade | Find the Best VPN | Today's Posts | Search |
| General Gnutella / Gnutella Network Discussion For general discussion about Gnutella and the Gnutella network. For discussion about a specific Gnutella client program, please post in one of the client forums above. |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| |||
| > Not all clients can act as superpeer (not enough bandwith, CPU > <snip> If a client is incapable of acting as an Ultrapeer, it can either continue to operate as a regular peer or connect to an Ultrapeer as a Leaf client. > so not all Limewire users can act as superpeers This is why (in LimeWire) you can disable Ultrapeer functionality, and the user will become a shielded leaf node. > so you get a mix of superpeer and normal clients. Can you give me technical reasons why this is a bad thing? > What do you wanna cluster, superpeers away from normal > client? I see... Ultrapeers are not completely seperating themselves from regular peers. AIUI, Ultrapeers are fully capable of connecting with regular peers. > exactly what was the idea behind superpeers, to balance and > reduce load and traffic. Ultrapeers shield low bandwidth users from high amounts of traffic. When Ultrapeers are clustered together, the possible search horizon is increased. I agree with Rapheal Manfredi (sorry if I spelled that wrong) that Moak, and users of both sides are not listening to eachother. |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| File choice for download | Pet48 | General Windows Support | 3 | March 24th, 2007 12:34 AM |
| The moment of choice | the porter | General Mac OSX Support | 5 | November 11th, 2005 04:03 PM |
| choice of langauge | weeun | General Windows Support | 0 | June 2nd, 2005 01:26 AM |
| IMG choice | mobear410 | New Feature Requests | 0 | March 17th, 2005 10:47 AM |
| opensource | WattsTech | General Discussion | 4 | October 7th, 2002 02:35 AM |