Gnutella Forums

Gnutella Forums (https://www.gnutellaforums.com/)
-   LimeWire Beta Archives (https://www.gnutellaforums.com/limewire-beta-archives/)
-   -   LimeWire 5.0.0 (https://www.gnutellaforums.com/limewire-beta-archives/34849-limewire-5-0-0-a.html)

Night-Fire April 3rd, 2005 06:44 AM

I'm just hoping that Java can make a uttility to lower the ammount of RAM it chews as we all know it isn't very ram efficient.:(

gaze of sorrow April 4th, 2005 10:12 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by bpmax
again... agreed... completely.

Until a few months ago, I'd load limewire on an amd 450 K2 processor... it's not much of an issue anymore with my new machine(a much faster new AMD), but for ppl with slower machines, such as my old one, LW can be crippling to one's processor.

Additionally, indexing upon booting LW each time (not initial hashing) just seems to tale a helluva lot longer than it should when sharing a large number of files.

My 2 bitz

i agree with both of your points. i still feel the effects on a amd 1.3 mg processer.

Night-Fire April 5th, 2005 12:58 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by gaze of sorrow
i agree with both of your points. i still feel the effects on a amd 1.3 mg processer.
you mean Gigahertz?

Lord of the Rings April 5th, 2005 01:28 AM

1.3 MHz sounds like how fast my windows works with or without LW. lol :D

Cant think of a name April 13th, 2005 07:04 PM

fast forward button
 
You need to add a fast forward bar to the player. Such as the thing used in WMP and iTunes where it moves along to tell you were your up to and you can jump forward in the song. Then i would actually use the player

Linuxhippy April 16th, 2005 12:52 PM

Lower cpu load
 
Hi there!

I am using Limewire on a 10mbit (->1mb/s downstream*g*) connection with a lot of paralell downloads, but even my 2.6ghz machine has a load between 2-5 on Linux.
(-> a 5ghz machine would be needed to process everything).

I've tried different JVMs (Sun client,server ; JRockIT; IBM) but the server-jvms (all except sun-client) seem all to produce more or less the same results.

so lower cpu-load is definitivly something I am really interrested in ;-)

lg Clemens

senor April 16th, 2005 04:12 PM

Re: fast forward button
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Cant think of a name
You need to add a fast forward bar to the player. Such as the thing used in WMP and iTunes where it moves along to tell you were your up to and you can jump forward in the song. Then i would actually use the player
Yeah the player needs to be updated...that and startup time are probably the biggest things for me.

Linuxhippy April 18th, 2005 10:33 AM

Hmm..
 
Totally agree here, I think nobody uses an player integrated in p2p software for more than just listen into a few files.

This all-in-one approach has several times prooven that it does not work very well...

lg Clemens

et voilą April 18th, 2005 10:41 AM

The LW player will be better in 5.0, you should see how when there is a 4.9 beta (I don't want to poil anything, but you can look at CVS commits) ;)

Ciao

verdyp April 21st, 2005 07:52 AM

NIO is already in alpha-tests for developers only.
There are still a fews things to correct, notably to find a way to detect that the host has no active connection (because NIO is not blocking and now LimeWire first attempts connections with UDP without waiting for a reply, nothing happens for long; there shoudl exist a watchdog to detect that some time has elapsed, so that the connection attempt is marked unresponsive; this code existed in the previous non-NIO based blocking code, but converting it to non-blocking NIO is still not perfect.

This just means that if you have no internet connection, with the alpha version, you won't get any notification with an alert box advizing to check your internet connectivity, and LimeWire stays for now indefinitely and silently in the "Connecting..." state until a connection is available. If you have Internet connected, then nothing seems bad, and Limewire is incredibly faster and uses much less CPU and memory paging to disk.

There are still some work to do to optimize the memory usage in Untrapeer mode, but the progress is still significant (for those users that have Java 1.4+; NIO is not available on MacOS Classic that just has Java 1.1.8; but MacOS Classic never qualifies to host a servent in Ultrapeer mode, so this is less a problem).

Windows users that still have Java 1.3.1 with an old version of LimeWire will really need to upgrade now to Java 1.4 to get NIO support and benefit of the improved performance.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:08 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.

Copyright © 2020 Gnutella Forums.
All Rights Reserved.