SuperNode Beta

#21 (permalink)

November 19th, 2001

afisk

LimeWire Developer

Join Date: May 6th, 2001

Location: New York

Posts: 691

Hey Vinnie -- good to see you over hear on the LimeWire forums!

The proprietary implementation problem is definitely an issue. Hopefully the openness of the query routing proposal (the QRP that Vinnie alluded to, the underlying technology behind the old "Sparky" alpha), and of the supernode scheme and the LimeWire source code will help mitigate this problem.

As far as discovery of servers, that is one of the trickiest problems that we have faced as well, although I think that Anurag and Chris have worked out most of the issues there.

Best,

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off Trackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Becoming an Ultrapeer/supernode	nweaver	Open Discussion topics	1	October 7th, 2005 03:24 PM
i dont wanna be a leaf how do i force supernode because leaf sucks	poo	Connection Problems	6	July 16th, 2003 10:19 PM
Wrong with SuperNode cache!	Sleipner	Open Discussion topics	8	March 6th, 2003 11:50 AM
supernode vs dedicated supernode	Unregistered	Gnucleus (Windows)	2	May 12th, 2002 08:53 PM
InstallShield - LimeWire SuperNode Alpha	TCW	LimeWire Beta Archives	0	November 6th, 2001 06:15 PM

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:46 AM.