![]() |
|
Register | FAQ | The Twelve Commandments | Members List | Calendar | Arcade | Find the Best VPN | Today's Posts | Search |
| LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| |||
![]() I would suggest that some percent of all transfers are cached. The files would be stored encrypted on users harddrives. Clients would REQUIRE that each users dedicates at least 100mb for the file caching (users may increase this). When users download they would not know if they are downloading from a cached source or someone sharing. This would solve sooooo many problems, increase the network resources, protect the network from attacks, ect. |
| |
![]() | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
how does Partial File Sharing compare to Bit Torrent? | sdsalsero | LimeWire Beta Archives | 6 | January 1st, 2004 05:16 PM |
Partial File Sharing in LW! | et voilą | LimeWire Beta Archives | 26 | July 6th, 2003 01:04 PM |
Segmented Hashes and Partial File Sharing | gnutellafan | New Feature Requests | 2 | April 18th, 2002 01:02 PM |
Release partial file sharing protocol | GnutellaFan | XoloX Feature Request | 2 | September 13th, 2001 05:39 AM |