Most clients, including Morpheus, look for clients of the same type as UPs, and favor those. No matter what client you use, you're going to mostly see leaves and search results from that same client type.

Now that's the usual BS you serve me, I thought we discussed about that earlier in PMs :rolleyes:

You are plain wrong, you are wasting my time as usual

------
Here are the PM of january 5th

Risky wrote on 01-05-2005 11:33 AM:
So I understand how not seeing GnucDNA results can be worrying, but this goes both ways. When I use Morpheus, most search results (which mostly come from NEOnet) represent other Morpheus clients, and in downloads, most transfers are from other Morpheus clients.

I think the reason you see this in search is because most clients, including Morpheus, favor their own clients as children, so Morpheus clients aren't reached as often in searches, and hence comprise only a small minority of search results.

Also, in download meshes, in theory, on average, the ratio of clients should reflect their respective popularity, so even if Morpheus downloaded from all clients independant of their brand, you could claim they were 'leeching' simply because they are in the minority, when in fact they are probably contributing relative to the fraction of the network they make up.

Do you disagree? I'd be curious to hear you

--
Re: GnucDNA 1.1.1.3 Gnucleus 2.0.6.0
by:me
I agree that the first results in Morpheus come from Neonet and that usually the user select those results to download. However, few seconds after that, Gnet results come in and the GnucDNA engine uses those sources to swarm from them. Even if you connect in GnucDNA clusters, most Gnet results (all?) come from LW, BS and RAZA. I noticed that when running LW in UP mode, I see as much Morpheus leaves then Shareaza leaves. I always get results from Shareaza, never from GnucDNA unless I target my searches to find some (one rare word in any type of search).

I made my mind long ago about that behavior... I can't figure GnuDNA people never figured that out. What are you waiting.. more than 50 % of marketshare to see the effects and people switching network? You should be happy to still get loyal trolls like Vampmon that spread your word (on that troll, he always tells us the next version solves all problems and is better than slice bread ---lololol---)
--------

LOL ... Funny.
People are almost sick of you ... you go on about how other people are a troll, yet you are the only troll. You are only just-about accepted on this forum, I’ve seen on other forums, such as Shareaza that they don't take your bullshit, no one else will accept your **** except here. Soon enough they will get tired of you.

I've posted the proof over in the LimeWire section that Morpheus & GnucDNA [Gnucleus] does not leech, yet you still persist in being a troll, move on dude your act is old. I’m tried of it, everyone is. I have many other screenshots of LimeWire 4.4.2, 4.4.1, 4.4.0 uploading from me, i just haven't posted them. Same with BearShare and i get LOADS of Shareaza' uploads too.

Where were you Vampmon, I missed you terribly :cool: Don't forget to bring me chocolates and flowers on the 14th :D

I will :) you've been on my mind every since i joined Gnutella Forums. :)

For anyone who's downloaded the preview version, visit www.morpheus.com and upgrade to the latest, stable version.

I don't think you can find many Morpheus results, even if it weren't a leecher client. There are most likely no more than 50,000 Morpheus hosts on the Gnutella network at any time. Even giFT has more users than Morpheus.

http://www.kullen.rwth-aachen.de/~gr...er/crawl2.html

Nice crawler TJ :) Why aren't bearshare nodes counted?

Ciao

Where does Aquisition get counted? Is it included within LW stats or is it so small it doesn't even register. OR is it a leecher. lol :D

Their ultrapeers don't support the UDP crawler extension and their leafs don't connect to LimeWire ultrapeers.

There might still be a larger number of Morpheus hosts that is connected to BearShare ultrapeers and a few thousands connected to GnucDNA ultrapeers, although few of those actually accept incoming connections.

it's in the LimeWire count, 2372 ACQX ultrapeers and 6332 leafs according to that count.