|
| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | The Twelve Commandments | Members List | Calendar | Arcade | Find the Best VPN | Today's Posts | Search |
| New Feature Requests Your idea for a cool new feature. Or, a LimeWire annoyance that has to get changed. |
| View Poll Results: Which hashing scheme would you prefer? | |||
| Hashing takes 1 minute with 100% CPU use |     | 5 | 15.63% |
| Hashing takes 2 minutes with 50% CPU use |    | 27 | 84.38% |
| Voters: 32. You may not vote on this poll | |||
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
October 22nd, 2002
| |||
| |||
 Hashing things out Wouldn't it make sense to tie the amount of CPU usage for hashing filelists to the already present CPU choice for uploading files? If I am willing to devote 100% of CPU to uploads, I would also want to devote Max usage to the hash process and get it overwith. People with slower machines usually set CPU time for uploads a lot lower, and as such hashing could take a bit longer. Personally, when I run the program, I want the hash list done as quickly as possible so I can start editing and annotating the recent downloads. My 2cents worth  |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Library hashing | joeyjoe | BearShare Open Discussion | 3 | April 13th, 2006 06:36 AM |
| Hashing Files | thunt | Open Discussion topics | 1 | February 27th, 2005 09:40 PM |
| Hashing indicator | Treatid | New Feature Requests | 0 | October 22nd, 2002 04:56 AM |
| Hashing | Unregistered | New Feature Requests | 3 | July 18th, 2002 03:01 AM |
| Signing Files, but not quite Hashing..? | NiGHTSFTP | New Feature Requests | 26 | May 9th, 2002 04:06 PM |
Threaded Mode
