![]() |
|
Register | FAQ | The Twelve Commandments | Members List | Calendar | Arcade | Find the Best VPN | Today's Posts | Search |
New Feature Requests Your idea for a cool new feature. Or, a LimeWire annoyance that has to get changed. |
View Poll Results: Which hashing scheme would you prefer? | |||
Hashing takes 1 minute with 100% CPU use | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | 5 | 15.63% |
Hashing takes 2 minutes with 50% CPU use | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | 27 | 84.38% |
Voters: 32. You may not vote on this poll |
| LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| |||
![]() How about having LimeWire detect whether someone's computer has been idle for a while (5 to 10 minutes) and base the hashing speed on that? When the computer is actively in use by the user, slowdown the hashing speed so the user wouldn't notice a major slowdown when using other apps on their machine, but when the computer has been idle for 5 to 10 minutes, ramp up the hashing speed to full speed. When the user comes back and starts using their computer again, slow the hashing speed down again so it wouldn't affect the performance of other programs running. |
| |
![]() | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Library hashing | joeyjoe | BearShare Open Discussion | 3 | April 13th, 2006 06:36 AM |
Hashing Files | thunt | Open Discussion topics | 1 | February 27th, 2005 09:40 PM |
Hashing indicator | Treatid | New Feature Requests | 0 | October 22nd, 2002 04:56 AM |
Hashing | Unregistered | New Feature Requests | 3 | July 18th, 2002 03:01 AM |
Signing Files, but not quite Hashing..? | NiGHTSFTP | New Feature Requests | 26 | May 9th, 2002 04:06 PM |