![]() |
|
Register | FAQ | The Twelve Commandments | Members List | Calendar | Arcade | Find the Best VPN | Today's Posts | Search |
New Feature Requests Your idea for a cool new feature. Or, a LimeWire annoyance that has to get changed. |
| LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| |||
![]() Yeah but if the searches were automatically registered at intervals of an hour, surely this would not "flood" the system as an individual could manually generate many more searches in the same space of time. As I see it, this would not be such a problem but would aid the user in the sense that they would not have to babysit. You could also ensure that the programme does not auto search once the download is complete, so as to minimise network traffic. |
| |
![]() | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Make LW more memory efficient | LimeMAN | New Feature Requests | 0 | October 7th, 2006 11:29 AM |
Searches positive, but downloads are not | sahne | Download/Upload Problems | 1 | October 17th, 2005 09:05 AM |
More efficient searches? | Unregistered | General Gnutella Development Discussion | 0 | March 7th, 2002 02:32 PM |
Is 2.0 too efficient? | gfox | Download/Upload Problems | 1 | January 14th, 2002 06:48 PM |
Most efficient client (bandwidth usage?) | dredd zeppelin | General Gnutella / Gnutella Network Discussion | 0 | April 29th, 2001 02:46 PM |