|
| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | The Twelve Commandments | Members List | Calendar | Arcade | Find the Best VPN | Today's Posts | Search |
| New Feature Requests Your idea for a cool new feature. Or, a LimeWire annoyance that has to get changed. |
 |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| |
November 21st, 2004
| |||
| |||
 Automatic searches What if the was based on a non-time based factor, such as if the search was triggered by the download being held in queue or stagnant on for an extended period?? Something that would not happen in the instance of every download, but only when required, would this still be too much?  |
|
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Make LW more memory efficient | LimeMAN | New Feature Requests | 0 | October 7th, 2006 11:29 AM |
| Searches positive, but downloads are not | sahne | Download/Upload Problems | 1 | October 17th, 2005 09:05 AM |
| More efficient searches? | Unregistered | General Gnutella Development Discussion | 0 | March 7th, 2002 02:32 PM |
| Is 2.0 too efficient? | gfox | Download/Upload Problems | 1 | January 14th, 2002 06:48 PM |
| Most efficient client (bandwidth usage?) | dredd zeppelin | General Gnutella / Gnutella Network Discussion | 0 | April 29th, 2001 02:46 PM |
Hybrid Mode
