|
| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | The Twelve Commandments | Members List | Calendar | Arcade | Find the Best VPN | Today's Posts | Search |
| New Feature Requests Your idea for a cool new feature. Or, a LimeWire annoyance that has to get changed. |
 |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| |
October 7th, 2006
| |||
| |||
 Make LW more memory efficient I checked my task manager in winxp the other day, noticed that LW was using 40 MB of memory running. Today it's taking 28 MB. Pretty hefty requirements. I've noticed that winamp has ballooned over the years as well, now using like 20 MB running, used to use like 3-5 megs. As we the users of this forum request new features, LW will continue to grow in it's memory requirements. Is there any way for the DEVs to streamline the LW code as it moves forward with the project?  |
|
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| More efficient searches and downloads (3 ideas) | hello there everybody | New Feature Requests | 6 | November 21st, 2004 09:37 PM |
| HOW TO BE SMART FOR EFFICIENT DOWNLOADING !!! ...Because i'm feel idiot....:-( | Fredericurly | Download/Upload | 0 | April 10th, 2003 09:57 PM |
| More efficient searches? | Unregistered | General Gnutella Development Discussion | 0 | March 7th, 2002 02:32 PM |
| Is 2.0 too efficient? | gfox | Download/Upload Problems | 1 | January 14th, 2002 06:48 PM |
| Most efficient client (bandwidth usage?) | dredd zeppelin | General Gnutella / Gnutella Network Discussion | 0 | April 29th, 2001 02:46 PM |
Hybrid Mode
