![]() |
|
Register | FAQ | The Twelve Commandments | Members List | Calendar | Arcade | Find the Best VPN | Today's Posts | Search |
Open Discussion topics Discuss the time of day, whatever you want to. This is the hangout area. If you have LimeWire problems, post them here too. |
| LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| |||
![]() Right so, "If a direct connection cannot be established, the servent attempting the file download may request that the servent sharing the file “push” the file instead." The specification only says "may". You're saying that Limewire actually sends the PUSH in its present version? Is there any evidence that the IP in Servent Identifier Field ever responds by establishing a new TCP/IP connection to the port? This is most interesting. And, although this "may" work for firewalled hosts, what about all the other invalid IP responses contained in the pongs that end up being displayed as hits? Unless I am wrong on that as well. Does my machine suppress all the other hits that are invalid for different reasons? Thank you for humouring my in my ignorance David |
| |
![]() | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Is livewire under attack? | chrisbaby | Download/Upload Problems | 2 | July 17th, 2006 12:08 PM |
New Gnutella attack underway? 3-2005 | Gaggle | General Gnutella / Gnutella Network Discussion | 9 | April 1st, 2005 05:03 PM |
help me before i attack my computer with an axe | dontusewindows | Download/Upload Problems | 3 | March 19th, 2005 02:17 PM |
Attack against Gnutella Network | tiagonmas | General Gnutella / Gnutella Network Discussion | 5 | October 3rd, 2002 06:42 AM |
Gnutella/filesharing under attack...notice from Sony to ISPs | Unregistered | General Gnutella / Gnutella Network Discussion | 4 | November 22nd, 2001 06:44 PM |