BearShare Forums  

Go Back   Gnutella Forums > Current Gnutella Client Forums > BearShare (Windows) > BearShare Open Discussion
Register FAQ The Twelve Commandments Members List Calendar Arcade Find the Best VPN Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

BearShare Open Discussion Open topic discussion for BearShare users

Preview this popular software (BearShare Beta v5 "Download")


Welcome To Gnutella Forums

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content, fun aspects such as the image caption contest and play in the arcade, and access many other special features after your registration and email confirmation. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! (click here) (Note: we use Yandex mail server so make sure yandex is not on your email filter or blocklist.)

If you have any problems with the Gnutella Forum registration process or your Gnutella Forum account login, please contact us (this is not for program use questions.) Your email address must be legitimate and verified before becoming a full member of the forums. Please be sure to disable any spam filters you may have for our website, so that email messages can reach you.
Note: Any other issue with registration, etc., send a Personal Message (PM) to one of the active Administrators: Lord of the Rings or Birdy.

Once registered but before posting, members MUST READ the FORUM RULES (click here) and members should include System details - help us to help you (click on blue link) in their posts if their problem relates to using the program. Whilst forum helpers are happy to help where they can, without these system details your post might be ignored. And wise to read How to create a New Thread

Thank you

If you are a Spammer click here.
This is not a business advertising forum, all member profiles with business advertising will be banned, all their posts removed. Spamming is illegal in many countries of the world. Guests and search engines cannot view member profiles.



           Deutsch?              Español?                  Français?                   Nederlands?
   Hilfe in Deutsch,   Ayuda en español,   Aide en français et LimeWire en françaisHulp in het Nederlands

Forum Rules

Support Forums

Before you post to one of the specific Client Help and Support Conferences in Gnutella Client Forums please look through other threads and Stickies that may answer your questions. Most problems are not new. The Search function is most useful. Also the red Stickies have answers to the most commonly asked questions. (over 90 percent).
If your problem is not resolved by a search of the forums, please take the next step and post in the appropriate forum. There are many members who will be glad to help.
If you are new to the world of file sharing please do not be shy! Everyone was ‘new’ when they first started.

When posting, please include details for:
Your Operating System ....... Your version of your Gnutella Client (* this is important for helping solve problems) ....... Your Internet connection (56K, Cable, DSL) ....... The exact error message, if one pops up
Any other relevant information that you think may help ....... Try to make your post descriptive, specific, and clear so members can quickly and efficiently help you. To aid helpers in solving download/upload problems, LimeWire and Frostwire users must specify whether they are downloading a torrent file or a file from the Gnutella network.
Members need to supply these details >>> System details - help us to help you (click on blue link)


Moderators

There are senior members on the forums who serve as Moderators. These volunteers keep the board organized and moving.
Moderators are authorized to: (in order of increasing severity)
Move posts to the correct forums. Many times, members post in the wrong forum. These off-topic posts may impede the normal operation of the forum.
Edit posts. Moderators will edit posts that are offensive or break any of the House Rules.
Delete posts. Posts that cannot be edited to comply with the House Rules will be deleted.
Restrict members. This is one of the last punishments before a member is banned. Restrictions may include placing all new posts in a moderation queue or temporarily banning the offender.
Ban members. The most severe punishment. Three or more moderators or administrators must agree to the ban for this action to occur. Banning is reserved for very severe offenses and members who, after many warnings, fail to comply with the House Rules. Banning is permanent. Bans cannot be removed by the moderators and probably won't be removed by the administration.


The Rules

1. Warez, copyright violation, or any other illegal activity may NOT be linked or expressed in any form. Topics discussing techniques for violating these laws and messages containing locations of web sites or other servers hosting illegal content will be silently removed. Multiple offenses will result in consequences. File names are not required to discuss your issues. If filenames are copyright then do not belong on these forums & will be edited out or post removed. Picture sample attachments in posts must not include copyright infringement.

2. Spamming and excessive advertising will not be tolerated. Commercial advertising is not allowed in any form, including using in signatures.

3. There will be no excessive use of profanity in any forum.

4. There will be no racial, ethnic, or gender based insults, or any other personal attacks.

5. Pictures may be attached to posts and signatures if they are not sexually explicit or offensive. Picture sample attachments in posts must not include copyright infringement.

6. Remember to post in the correct forum. Take your time to look at other threads and see where your post will go. If your post is placed in the wrong forum it will be moved by a moderator. There are specific Gnutella Client sections for LimeWire, Phex, FrostWire, BearShare, Gnucleus, Morpheus, and many more. Please choose the correct section for your problem.

7. If you see a post in the wrong forum or in violation of the House Rules, please contact a moderator via Private Message or the "Report this post to a moderator" link at the bottom of every post. Please do not respond directly to the member - a moderator will do what is required.

8. Any impersonation of a forum member in any mode of communication is strictly prohibited and will result in banning.

9. Multiple copies of the same post will not be tolerated. Post your question, comment, or complaint only once. There is no need to express yourself more than once. Duplicate posts will be deleted with little or no warning. Keep in mind a forum censor may temporarily automatically hold up your post, if you do not see your post, do not post again, it will be dealt with by a moderator within a reasonable time. Authors of multiple copies of same post may be dealt with by moderators within their discrete judgment at the time which may result in warning or infraction points, depending on severity as adjudged by the moderators online.

10. Posts should have descriptive topics. Vague titles such as "Help!", "Why?", and the like may not get enough attention to the contents.

11. Do not divulge anyone's personal information in the forum, not even your own. This includes e-mail addresses, IP addresses, age, house address, and any other distinguishing information. Don´t use eMail addresses in your nick. Reiterating, do not post your email address in posts. This is for your own protection.

12. Signatures may be used as long as they are not offensive or sexually explicit or used for commercial advertising. Commercial weblinks cannot be used under any circumstances and will result in an immediate ban.

13. Dual accounts are not allowed. Cannot explain this more simply. Attempts to set up dual accounts will most likely result in a banning of all forum accounts.

14. Video links may only be posted after you have a tally of two forum posts. Video link posting with less than a 2 post tally are considered as spam. Video link posting with less than a 2 post tally are considered as spam.

15. Failure to show that you have read the forum rules may result in forum rules breach infraction points or warnings awarded against you which may later total up to an automatic temporary or permanent ban. Supplying system details is a prerequisite in most cases, particularly with connection or installation issues.

Violation of any of these rules will bring consequences, determined on a case-by-case basis.


Thank You! Thanks for taking the time to read these forum guidelines. We hope your visit is helpful and mutually beneficial to the entire community.


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old June 10th, 2001
JD
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Exclamation BEARSHARE clients & its encrypted packets (NOTE: Not related to it's 'spyware')

Bearshare is a very stable and good Gnutella Net client.
However, it does things, which are covert, deliberately encrypted to avoid us users in knowing what the packets contain, and apart from this, it installs 'spyware' into your PC.
The author of Bearshare tries to tell you, that it isn't spyware, but semantics are used by many to try to 're-educate' your conception of meaning to their meaning(s).

This thread is NOT in regards to this 'spyware', which is dealt with in other threads and forums already!

It is in regards to encryped packets, Bearshare clients send
out, to each other, over the Gnutella Network.

The 'Gnutella Net' is much more important than ONE (1) client, as good as it may be.
The Gnutella Net MUST stay FREE of uncessary traffic (packets) and free of ellbowing tactics from certain programs and their creators.

Bearshare falls into this category. There may be others, and there will be others.

Thanks to one amazing person, the creator of the original 'gnutella.exe', we now have a 'Gnutella Net', used by more and more people.
Here is where the problems start and won't stop. Commercialism, Greed for control and money suddenly rake their heads. Popup banners, surfing data covertely collected, surfing programs becoming copyright and doing all sorts of strange things, unbeknown to most users.
advantage of it (their advantage).

Before I get carried away further, below is what I have found so far on the 'Bearshare encryped packet' behaviour:
(Note that these are preliminary observations, and may contain 'incorrect assumptions').

Version used for testing: V2.23

1. Bearshare does NOT contact 'base' or 'phone home'.
It does its upgrade function (which one cannot turn off)
by communicating with AND through the host(s) one is
connected to!

2. It sends short & ENCRYPTED packes before, inbetween
and/or after 'normal' Gnutella Net Protocoll packets.
They must contain (at least) it's own version number
and some queries, which are only understood by other
Bearshare programs.

3. It instantly pops up the UPDATE Notice, when one
connects to another Bearshare client user, who uses
a higher version of Bearshare!
This can be several minutes AFTER one has started the
program.

4. If the host(s) connected to, don't use the Bearshare
program, (e.g. uses Gnotella, PHEX or whatever), it waits, sends sporadically (there must be some
timing/messaging sequence behind it) the encrypted
packets, and BINGO, there is somewhere another host with a higher version of Bearshare connected to us via other hosts, and up pops the UPDATE notice.
Now this host could be several hops away!!!
And could be connected to oneself via upto 7 (or whatever
max. TTL we all have set) other hosts (speak computers).

5. The creator of Bearshare, Vinnie, has acknowledged, that
(at least) previous versions of Bearshare where designed to preferably connected to OTHER Bearshare clients.
It seemed at times, that these earlier versions did
not connect to anyone else, but Bearshare users!
This 'feature' has beem either removed or at least
toned down.

6. The Encryption is more or less unbreakable, according to its author. Now this should get any programming wizzard
a spin in trying to 'translate' it!

7. Summary:
- Bearshare does not contact any specific IP or site
(only of course the 2 host servers) on startup or
thereafter.
- It sends encrypted packets to contact other Bearshare
programs on the Gnutella Network.
- It receives update information from these other
Bearshare programs it 'sees' on the network (which
also send their encrypted packets around of course).
- There is no stopping these packets.
- They cannot be decoded (at this stage) other than
by the author of Bearshare (and maybe his/her associated sponsors).
- The packets are short, around 600 bits of hex.
- The power such encrypted packets communicating with
each other and their own sources have, is too BIG.
They open doors for all sorts of doings. (Control of the Gnutella Net for starters).

Please continue to post any helpful findings on these encrypted packets either under this thread (preferable for easier compilation and finding) or make your own.

Hopefully somebody can come up with some answers on how to block these packets going out onto the network (and in/out of our computers).

JD
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old June 10th, 2001
Gnutella Admirer
 
Join Date: May 28th, 2001
Posts: 56
Sephiroth is flying high
Default

LOL hahahah reeducation i think you forgot mind control, the government, and aliens too.

You used a outdated version to do your little tests therefore they mean nothing. All your accusations and horrors of the encrypted packets are ALL false either because of how the protocol works, or by logic. No one in their right mind will take over gnutella because then they would get sued.

You exgerated things and used hints at threats and etc. to show your point which makes me believe you did not post that to show the truth or anything near it. Therefore i think your full of it.

The packets contain ONLY the version info and if they were as bad as you say they are then why hasnt the developers of the other servents blocked them yet?? Maybe because they are what vinnie says they are? If they were unnessecary as you say then why have they allowed them to stay?
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old June 12th, 2001
UKGuy
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Wink Better research next time

As has been pointed out, your 'tests' as you like to call them, were done using BearShare 2.2.3 which is NOT the latest version, 2.2.4 is.

Vinnie (the author of BearShare) has explained the purpose of these encrypted packets in the BearShare forums, but obviously can't reply to every paranoid post on the web. The encrypted packets are there to exchange version information between BearShare clients, and are designed to stop hackers or other low-lifes from faking a new version of the software. Remember the fake version of PKZip that was in fact a virus!!?? Well I guess Vinnie is trying to stop that from happening to BearShare (which is after all, the most popular gnutella client today).

So, the author puts in a feature to protect the integrity of the software, and all you can do is bleat about what you don't understand. Shame on you... did you actually do any research anywhere to discover what these encrypted packets were about?

And what is your problem with BearShare warning you that your software is out of date by popping up an UPDATE notice? Later versions may include important bug-fixes or enhancements, so it is only right that the software should let you know about new versions. And what does it matter if this happens several minutes after you start the program...? Obviously you have never watched American TV! Adverts... Credits... Adverts... 5 minutes of the program you want to watch... More adverts.... you get the picture ;-)

As to the spyware thing, well that's been done to death. Suffice to say that in the latest version of BearShare (2.2.4) there are very clear messages about 'adware' during the install routine, and you have the option to NOT install these components. Problem solved.

Beam me up....
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old June 13th, 2001
JD
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Reply to Agros

Seems you guys don't like your little secrets being discussed and the pandorra boxes being opened up by users of your programs like me.

Just for your information, in case it's an oversight:
Would I have used the latest version 2.24 instead of 2.23, I would have not been able to test this curious update behaviour of Bearshare and I certainly haven't seen mentioned it or read an explanation about it anywhere.

Your reaction shows your disquiet on others finding out about it.

JD
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old June 13th, 2001
BearShare Developer
 
Join Date: May 25th, 2001
Posts: 163
Vinnie is flying high
Default Stop

Stop replying to these nuts, its a waste of time.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old June 14th, 2001
UKGuy
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Wink You're right

You are absolutely right, it's a waste of time replying to these twats.

The fact that he/she/it TOTALLY IGNORED the explanation, and just droned on about it like it's some conspiracy theory is evidence that they know their accusations have been refuted. However, like any other child - when presented with the prospect of losing their argument they just ignore the facts, stamp their little feet and throw more accusations.

Pathetic really. Thankyou and goodnight.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old June 15th, 2001
Unregistered
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Thumbs down

You are right, you could have it check CNET or other sites once a week to see if there is a new version available, no need for remote packet control.
You are right again, man you are good!
You are so right for making a little click box on the settings screen that shuts this check off so that smart non drug users can act like adults and check for themselves.
You are just so right!
It's right to not remote control peoples programs with packets no one really knows what is in them or what they really do for sure. You would have to be a fool to think people would put up with that for a minute, you are so right!
You are right that there would be no end to the bad karma you would produce from something like that, not to mention all the bad press you would get till you took it out. You may be right in thinking that even a large public company might never recover from bad press like that and that any smart CEO or even a janitor would have fixed it right away, no sane person would let something like that linger on and on, you are right again!
Thanks for being such a great programmer and developer and seeing all this from a users point of view instead of the way most shut-in control freak power trip never see the light of day little twit programmers that lock users into "their way or the highway". Don't you just hate that?
It's so nice to see highly trained, seasoned professional adult programmers understand the privacy issues invloved and make changes fast when this sort of thing comes up. You are so right that open source is the way to go to prevent misuse of gnutella by greedy interests.
Thanks again, and you are right!
Man, you are so cool! keep up the great work! thanks! wow! thumbs up! dude! man, dude! you da man!
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old June 23rd, 2001
Moak
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

After the Bearshare.net forums has been reset, I'm now very thankfull to know how Bearshare gets his "new bearshare" information and that Bearshare has added a second private feature into the Gnutella Protocol.

The original posting from JD was very friendly, let me continue there.

Hmm, to speak very friendly (I'll try)... I don't think it is a good idea that one client producer takes an open protocoll and adds some unknown features without informing or discussing with the global community about nessecary enhancements. You ask Why?
a) protocoll modifications affect the whole network and all other clients, they have to route them.
b) protocoll modifications should be coordinated or soon every client programmer will wildly add some features. This _may_ (not will) cause into incompability of clients or malfunction of the global gnutella network or simply improves complexity when all clients try to understand which "gnutella slang" an other client speaks.
c) writing new gnutella servants will be very difficult without having all necessary features documentated.
d) you need the other clients, you're not alone. Gnutella is an community, at least you started with that idea, don't you?
e) undocumentated features may open security problems in future. Any future client/proxy/application gateway _has_to_ filter out potential risks, this because undocumented protocoll features maybe used by exploits so they get blocked.
f) a non-productive client war may be started, because one client producer thinks he has to block or ignore features he does not agree with... mabye only because of misunderstanding or an lack of communication. Or does this client civil allready begun?
g) The variety of gnutella clients will be decreased, because the user will not decide for gnutella servant, but for a client (or one client will try to knock out every other competitor). Think about the webbrowser story, will your servant win?
h) Add more here. Do you remember all the problems and discussion about internet technology the last years?

At the end company interests are standing against users interests, is this what is all about? For the interest of users only an open standard will be good, proprietary is for the company interests. Let me play around with fantasy:
When gnutella protocoll will NOT be further developed as an open standard... other ideas like swarmcast or Morpheus will win and all fine gnutella servants (name them Bearshrae or Limewire or Moakella) will be vanished and theire programmers work for Warner Bros or Sony and an alternative money making P2P system.
So maybe cooperation is an possible business concept for Free Peers Inc, Lime Wire LLC, etc? Still name your client "the best" or "the most powerfull" but marketing or egoism won't help...
my suggestion: improve technology by using open standards and make money with usability and the real best client.

Hope you like my suggestion, thx for reading & enjoy your weekend!
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old July 2nd, 2001
Unregistered
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Anybody succeeded in filtering out these encrypted packets Yet????
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old July 3rd, 2001
Unregistered
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Yes, change one byte - the packets need a encrypted microsoft tagged RSA style key that is built into the code near the end. Take a hex editor and change one byte of that key and the key will be un-usable, so will the remote control spy packets. Since it checks all packets that come in before passing them on, it will not pass what it thinks is a invalid packet to anyone else!
This may not work for versions above 2.2.5 so make a copy of the exe file and give it a try!
There is no reason for ANY program like this to have secret RSA keys built into them! WHY IS IT THERE? Disable it today! It's easy and it's fun!
Everyone does this and all will be happy on Gnutella again.
Maybe programmers that think they are so cool and beyond everyone else will think again. Maybe not, arrogance sucks doesn't it? Respect peoples privacy and stop being greedy and maybe people will leave you alone.
Oh, you won't see this posted on that other forum, censorship is the word of choice over there, nor will you see any other truths about that silly program and all it's privacy invasions and lack of concern for privacy.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Bearshare -> malformed packets? DMF Connection Problems 1 February 4th, 2005 06:50 PM
Newbie refresher course - bearshare spy-packets scandal Nosferatu BearShare Open Discussion 4 March 29th, 2002 07:55 PM
Which gnutella clients use SpyWare? ahcollin General Gnutella / Gnutella Network Discussion 8 January 1st, 2002 11:20 PM
One question about encrypted packets bodhi BearShare Open Discussion 26 June 22nd, 2001 03:20 AM
"spyware" clients? any recommendations? newmz General Gnutella / Gnutella Network Discussion 1 May 22nd, 2001 11:05 PM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:10 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.

Copyright © 2020 Gnutella Forums.
All Rights Reserved.