![]() |
None of those items will do any good If someone has written in a "security hole" none of the items mentioned above will track or detect it. Granted, a *known* virus will get detected. A firewall will track traffic from xolox.. but who can tell what that traffic is reading.. or copying, or scanning. It's probably just me being paranoid... but when my HD starts to click.. and I'm not running anything to read it (other than xolox), I always wonder. How hard would it be to put in a back-door for a malicious user? My guess is that it would not be a radical change to allow this sort of thing. "It's not paranoia.. if they're really after you." |
Quote:
|
np. :) PS: Ultraedit is a fine HEXedit :) |
No Backdoor Believe me, there's no backdoor in my release. I also checked the original 1.13 source and found nothing of interest. DONnerkopf |
1.13 is da bomb i think you did a real nice job on it DON, been running GREAT here since dec 2. Forget the hacks, this one is good. xolox113.zip thanks DONnerkofp for keeping the torch burnning. |
|
Anything new worth mentioning in the 1.13 unofficial version? |
well there seems to be 2 xolox113.zip files going around one is a cracked v1.12 exe file that you must copy over your working xolox.exe, and the other one http://all2all.virtualave.net/p2p/xolox113us.zip is the full installer. it shows as v1.13 on the splash screen, GUI and about menu. and at least on my computer, seems to use less memory. DON? |
patch worries Quote:
|
Quote:
(they used different timers for their checks). DONnerkopf |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:37 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2020 Gnutella Forums.
All Rights Reserved.