GnucDNAr3 is for porting gnucdna to other platforms so I don't care, the changes in the last 8 months have been only on GnucDNAr2 (gnutella2), the gnutella implementation in harmful leeching and outdated. Plus the source code of gnucleus is diffucult to understand as John doesn't document is code. Now with the number of people using gnucdna you would think they commit patches but it isn't the case because the code sucks. You can compare that with LW and Gtk-gnutella that are open source but reveive many patches (even if gtk-gnutella is less known).

Die gnucdna die. I can't believe it has supporters, you must be blind.

Edit: If you want gnucDNA to be more loved ask John one thing:
1) removes the gnutella portion of gnucdna and become g2 only
or
2)gnucdna should never start up as an ultrapeer (this is the reason why I HATE gnucdna, but I do not like the fact that it leeches).

__________________
Liens d'intérêt /Links of interest:
Gnutellaforums en français /The House's rules you have to respect / First search the forum, then create a thread / Free software alternatives! - Logiciels alternatifs gratuits!/