![]() |
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | The Twelve Commandments | Members List | Find the Best VPN | Today's Posts | Search |
| Help & Support Information on the useage and anything else of Phex
- Unless you are using or asking about PHEX, please do not post in this section (Get ”Phex 3.4.2.163 universal" now) |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
The last official release of Phex for MacOSX uses the java 5 or 6 stub within the app. This of course is incompatible with later version java. The java stub could also be problematic running within different OSX versions which may use a different java 6 variation.
Running Phex under any version of Java: One solution to the Java 5 or 6 Stub problem is to use the: 3.4.2.163 universal version. This version will call whichever version of Java exists on the system including Java 7 or 8 or probable later java version. Only inconvenience is opening the program via the phex.jar file within the program lib folder. (Just my thoughts: Phex really needs to be re-compiled on OSX with a newer java (JDK) version with backward java version compatibility for creating the starter app. Alternative is for the app to simply point to the phex.java file in lib (renamed Resources to match OSX application protocol.) Creating the app pointer can potentially be done manually with help of Unix perm's & commands.) |
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| i need help; LW says please install the new version of java after installing Java | Logan_2468 | Windows | 7 | October 5th, 2009 11:07 PM |
| workaround for GUI-freeze-bug | konrad_h | General Discussion | 8 | April 22nd, 2006 06:37 AM |
| Recommended workaround for no-requery behavior | jlamoree | Download/Upload Problems | 1 | March 31st, 2003 08:44 AM |
| Why is the Linux LimeWire so hideous compared to the MacOSX version? | Superhyper | LimeWire Beta Archives | 0 | December 21st, 2002 12:50 PM |