View Single Post
  #3 (permalink)  
Old February 3rd, 2007
Nounoune's Avatar
Nounoune Nounoune is offline
Novicius
 
Join Date: January 30th, 2007
Posts: 2
Nounoune is flying high
Default

Bonjour,
Merci d'avoir répondu. J'ai fait rouler un tas d'antispywares et d'antivirus et ils n'ont rien trouvé. En cherchant sur le web, j'ai trouvé un truc qui semblait s'appliquer à mon problème: il s'agirait de symlink. Pour citer le gars:
(désolée mais c'est en anglais et je ne suis pas bonne pour traduire):

"Deleting Symlinks With Normal Windows Filesystem Tools Is Not Only Dangerous But Also Bizarre

The Bad: According to every source I've read on the web, you don't want to delete your symlinks except with a program specially designed to work with them. The reason invariably given is that if you try to delete a symlink with, for example, Explorer, you will delete all the files under the link.

The Good: For some mysterious reason I decided to test some delete operations using Explorer and rmdir. And lo! the directories and files under the links didn't delete! Could it be that people writing about symlinks all this time have just been parroting the First Symlink Hacker's warning about deleting, and it's wrong?

The Ugly: Actually, no; it's worse than you've heard. Explorer's behavior on deleting a link depends on the amount of data in the target directory. There appears to be a threshold (in my tests, between 406 and 449 megabytes, on a partition with 3.42G capacity, with 1.73G used, after deleting the 449 meg), above which, Explorer will delete the contents under your symlink when you delete the symlink. Restoring the symlink from the Recycle Bin does not restore the deleted data. But below the volume threshold, Explorer does not delete the target's data, but flags it invisibly for final deletion! This means you can delete a symlink, and then still use the data formerly under it, until you empty the Recycle Bin. Then the contents of the targeted folder will vanish. There is no warning about this behavior. Also unexpected is that the actual target directory appears never to delete; only its contents. "

Ça ne regarde pas trop bien pour mon problème Aussi, ma question c'est: est-ce que LW crée ce genre de liens quand il scanne l'ordinateur pour l'intégrer à sa médiathèque?
J'ai inclus une reproduction de mon écran pour mieux illustrer ce que j'essaie d'expliquer:
http://www.pixentral.com/show.php?pi...fduk3YALS8in02

J'aimerais bien savoir à quoi consiste le comportement normal de LimeWire et à quoi il aurait dû ressembler. Pourrais-tu m'expliquer, svp?
Mes excuses pour la longueur de ce message,
Reply With Quote