View Single Post
  #7 (permalink)  
Old February 21st, 2002
Unregistered
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Moak
-on gnutelladev.com- I found no concept design or class descriptions and the code had (like Mutella) very few comments to get a overview.
And that is why C++ sucks so bad, you guys won't take the time to document your classes, so how the hell do you expect anyone else but you to use them? Or is that the point? Job security?

Progremmers will never document properly, it's just part of the nature of this type of nural network, so C++ will always suck.

How silly is it to write a commercial app depending on other "classes" that may or may not crash / cause problems beacause you didn't write the code yourself and learn how it works, or the documentation sucks so you call it wrong?

Then the language, what a joke. Some guy decided he wanted his own little language when he came up with this C++ stuff, so he re-wrote the way you speak C. "classes" "destructors" what a joke.

And the :: and string += stuff is way too stupid, now you have these want-to-be Jr. programmers who don't understand how to handle a real string in memory, and how it is all really memory mapped and when you add more like strcat(str1,str2) it takes processor time.

go program basic and leave the real programming to professionals.
Reply With Quote