Quote:
Originally posted by Unregistered A really cool video producer I know dropped your client because he couldn't DISTRIBUTE his very funny and original comedy video files anymore with it.
The concept with distribution is to let people get your content as many ways as you can.
Since he's not a big technical type, as most of these people are not, he hasn't put his files back on line since.
THANKS VINNIE!!!!!
As usual, a dumb **** short sighted, no vision move. |
Okay you got me. We dropped the feature temporarily because the upload logic was completely re-written, and it was going to take at least a week to re-implement the web page feature. There are some other improvements that I wanted to make to it (like a Web Publishing Wizard type script component) so that was going to drag it on for more days.
I agree, it was a useful feature for those wanting to self-publish.
Quote:
You said this back when there were only 10,000 nodes, so now what's the problem |
I think you misunderstand - the browser download feature that was enabled through the "user web page" is OK, because it was opt-in, and the person who was allowing the browser downloads got something in return. This, we should allow, for the reasons you mentioned above.
But allow *direct* browser downloads, from a link off any web page, without going through the user web site "door page" is most certainly a bad idea.
Well, at least for the Gnutella type downloads. If you really want to serve a file to anybody with BearShare, all you need to do is drop the file in your Html directory and use a URL like this:
http://{ip_address}:6346/{filename.ext}
That always worked, but people don't usually put their shared files in the Html directory.