View Single Post
  #19 (permalink)  
Old January 23rd, 2003
Paulo
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Question

Quote:

i'm not bitching, as i love the idea of napshare, and would love to see it working properly.
Sorry for my naive question, but why continue to use/develop NapShare?

The code base is already obsolete, and gtk-gnutella is far ahead:

* It has flow control
* It has powerful filter chains.
* It has swarming.
* It has SHA1 checking.
* It has download mesh support
* It has leaf/Ultrapeer support (CVS only)
* It has a GTK2 front-end (nice) or a GTK1 classic front-end.

Remember: NapShare is a clone of gtk-gnutella at version 0.13!

I used to like NapShare myself, but since I tried gtk-gnutella, I will no longer move back to NapShare, which looks like a "toy" in comparison (no offense).

Paulo
Reply With Quote