![]() |
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | The Twelve Commandments | Members List | Calendar | Arcade | Find the Best VPN | Today's Posts | Search |
| Feature Requests & Bug Reports Is there anything you'd wish to see in Phex, or did you find some bugs? |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#51
|
|||
|
|||
|
I've noticed a few times when I'm queued for a download, I'm sitting in position 1 and the software is counting down the seconds to "retry the connection." What happens next is that it says, "Connecting..." then "Host busy." This seems a bit like getting to the front of the queue for a really busy night club, then getting out of the queue to walk away somewhere and ask a bouncer if you can get in, only to be told "queue up like everyone else." You almost invariably lose your place in the queue and, if the host is busy enough, you lose your chance to connect at all. Is this auto-retry an essential component to the network's operation, or can Phex be made to just quietly assume that it'll get to download the file when the host is ready?
|
|
#52
|
|||
|
|||
Also:
![]() This looks to me like spamming of the search system... perhaps more efforts by the same quasi-legalised terrorists supported by the US government... I tried banning some of the addresses in a search, but noticed that they continue to show up again and again. Perhaps Phex could introduce a method of banning hosts from querying; I'm not sure exactly how the query system works under the bonnet, but if Phex-based ultrapeers aren't passing on these queries, entire sections of the network might be far less taxed and potentially able to share their data more efficiently. |
|
#53
|
|||
|
|||
|
The host you are talking to is deciding where you are in the queue and if you are allowed to download. The host should hold the connection and you in queue until its time to download then it should be your turn. But apparently it throws you out of queue, maybe because of a communication problem? I don't know. Is it always one specific vendor/version where this happens?
About the spamming... Its very difficult to detect this kind of spamming. Phex already uses various filter method to detect and block spam messages. The problem here is that the spam is most likely not coming from the IP displayed but is just routed through that host... Currently we have no method to block this kind of spam. BTW, would you like to try to use the Phex release posted here: http://www.gnutellaforums.com/360345-post5.html Gregor |
|
#54
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|
#55
|
|||
|
|||
|
I meant to say, by the way... the .143 version seems to have a few glitches in the labelling:
<removed image> That's the only bug I've found so far, though - it otherwise seems quite superior to the "stable" version that can never download files any more. Last edited by GregorK; October 15th, 2011 at 05:36 AM. |
|
#56
|
|||
|
|||
|
Please try .155
Index of /snapshots |
|
#57
|
|||
|
|||
|
Wow. Spam much? The asshat even inserted dren into a quote of my post...
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Feature Requests | sberlin | New Feature Requests | 558 | August 6th, 2011 07:41 AM |
| Assorted feature requests | topbanana | New Feature Requests | 0 | April 27th, 2003 05:00 AM |
| *feature requests | hugacloud | Shareaza (Windows) | 7 | July 8th, 2002 09:37 PM |
| 2 feature requests | [email protected] | New Feature Requests | 0 | September 7th, 2001 06:14 PM |