I think that the four nat traversal options are redundant.

A simple NAT with the respective options would be better, I think (I had to readup myself on the difference between using RUDP, NAT Traversal and NAT port mapping (I knew UPnP).

Rather each client should include the options it has (vastly different, though the purpose is the same: better connection behind a NAT).

__________________

-> put this banner into your own signature! <-
--
Erst im Spiel lebt der Mensch.
Nur ludantaj homoj vivas.
GnuFU.net - Gnutella For Users
Draketo.de - Shortstories, Poems, Music and strange Ideas.