![]() |
|
Register | FAQ | The Twelve Commandments | Members List | Calendar | Arcade | Find the Best VPN | Today's Posts | Search |
General Gnutella Development Discussion For general discussion about Gnutella development. |
| LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| |||
![]() hi, this is just a limewire proposal and as far as i know it isn't used beacause all these things can be done with the 0.6 handshake. here some lines (0.6 specification): ....... Lime Wire LLC had proposed using the GUIDs of initial ping requests as a form of protocol versioning. For example, the last byte of the GUID of the first message by a client would be 0 if the client spoke the "Gnutella 0.5" protocol, 1 if the client spoke the "Gnutella 0.6" protocol, etc. While this scheme is backwards- compatible, it is imperfect. First, it does not provide ways for clients to support different combinations of protocol extensions. If, for example, clients at the "0.6" level were to support QRP and pong-caching, a servent would be required to implement both. Second, this scheme places a burden on the servent implementer. For example, a servent trying to accept only connections with QRP support must put new connections on "probation" until it has received the initial ping. ....... CU |
| |
![]() | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
I give up | caloundratattoo | Chat - Open Topics - The Lounge | 4 | October 14th, 2005 04:01 PM |
give me this | gnutotella | XoloX Feature Request | 5 | January 14th, 2003 01:31 PM |
Problem identifying Descriptor IDs | Paradog | General Gnutella Development Discussion | 5 | July 25th, 2002 03:04 PM |
Payload descriptor codes | Unregistered | General Gnutella Development Discussion | 3 | May 26th, 2002 11:13 PM |
Descriptor Help | Ahri | General Gnutella / Gnutella Network Discussion | 7 | August 23rd, 2001 08:13 AM |