![]() |
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | The Twelve Commandments | Members List | Calendar | Arcade | Find the Best VPN | Today's Posts | Search |
| General Gnutella Development Discussion For general discussion about Gnutella development. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
I have an idea I wonder is it worth to consider!
The current scheme lets a query to be sent to a Max(TTL) away neighbors. So when we are doing a search we are always doing search aproximately on the same set of servants. Okay it may change since some servants may go and some may come but this is not the case within 10 minutes. But what if we don't broadcast the query but instead pass it randomly to only a neighbor. Let say query is passed Max(TTL)*N nodes. And say N is greater than 3. So the query will be broadcasted at this node instead the originating. Such a node should be away from the original search spcae. So search space will be expanded with a linear growth of network traffic. With such a scheme it is possible to find some files that are not easily found. Okay network pressure might be a problem. But is it actually? I don't know. What do you think of this? |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
That is the same as just adding 1 to the TTL which as we know right now is bad.
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Songs keep jumping with the LimeWire player | Sxott | General Windows Support | 1 | February 25th, 2005 02:58 AM |
| Writing Java client.. how should I implement query/query hits? | Tw|st3r | General Gnutella Development Discussion | 1 | December 26th, 2004 11:03 PM |
| d/l jumping from 80kb/s to 4kb/s (example) | Krizzy | Download/Upload Problems | 1 | October 1st, 2004 03:39 PM |
| Jumping cursor in the search box | DarthDemo | Support: Bugs | 6 | December 26th, 2002 10:08 AM |
| Songs seem to be jumping | Unregistered | Download/Upload Problems | 1 | January 25th, 2002 02:10 PM |