![]() |
| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | The Twelve Commandments | Members List | Calendar | Arcade | Find the Best VPN | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| General Gnutella Development Discussion For general discussion about Gnutella development. |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| |
| |||
| I agree that there are problems to grouping. However if it is dynamic, based both on what you are sharing and what you are searching for, and you are able to belong to multiple groups it should offer benifits. As for packets containling multiple queries. Is bandwith more an issue of packet size or number? Is there data on how much of the query bandwith is taken up by the top 10 or 20 searches? I imagine it is quite large. If ultrapeers could cache the results and give extra ttl to others results might be better. BTW, when will we see a release of cultiv8r? I would love to try your client out. Email me at gnutellafan@hotmail.com |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Writing Java client.. how should I implement query/query hits? | Tw|st3r | General Gnutella Development Discussion | 1 | December 26th, 2004 11:03 PM |
| Solving the GnucDNA problem (in part) | et voilą | LimeWire Beta Archives | 7 | March 24th, 2004 07:04 AM |
| query | cHEssHire | User Experience | 3 | June 19th, 2002 11:43 AM |
| Problem Solving Checklist | donzelli | Connection Problems | 0 | June 9th, 2002 01:50 AM |
| Query | Unregistered | General Gnutella Development Discussion | 1 | April 20th, 2002 03:24 PM |