Hmmm... I think the problem is the term "child porn". Even photo shootings featuring under aged children are allowed, as long as they do not show (or directly imply) pornographic elements. (Depends on the country, however.) And the picture galleries you linked to seem to contain only anime style images of (potentially) underaged girls that are bound by different means, but do not show directly pornographic elements... Therefore and because of the fact that these are paintings, not real porn (even a movie that doesn't show real pictures is often not considered as "real" porn), they are not considered as child porn at all... in fact, they are not even considered as porn (or at least those I had a quick look at, as that style of content is not what I am interested in ) and I have to admit that I have seen already much worse content that is still considered being legal before the law...


mfg,
Old

__________________
</td><td><a href="http://crawler.trillinux.org"><img align="right" style="border:0" src="http://crawler.trillinux.org/img/netsize.png" alt="Network size"></a></td></table>