|
Register | FAQ | The Twelve Commandments | Members List | Calendar | Arcade | Find the Best VPN | Today's Posts | Search |
General P2P Network Discussion For general discussion about peer-to-peer networks. |
| LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| |||
Quote:
That danger exists no matter how many hops are used, it's just different probability. But yes, it's possible, although I'm hoping the high fan-out factor will make sure the isolated islands are "big enough" |
| |||
Btw I just released 0.5.8. Important new features are: https://github.com/zlatinb/muwire/wi...e-Certificates https://github.com/zlatinb/muwire/wiki/Search-Phrases also I removed the forced update check on startup, although that will take effect only after the second restart. |
| ||||
Quote: edit: Quote:
|
| |||
Quote:
Quote:
You can issue certificates for files you're adding to the shared pool. Then when someone browses you or you return a search result, they can choose to import those certificates. It's true that your own certificates are of little use to yourself, but they help other verify the origin of the file. This way you can establish reputation. 32kb is a couple of pages of text I think. |
| |||
I just released 0.5.10. Features a new search result display option - you can group by file instead of by sender. Also a right-click option on shared files that shows exactly who has searched for your files and who has downloaded them. Hope you like that! |
| ||||
Quote:
I am finding the search results are somewhat more inclusive now or perhaps it's just the search terms. Keeping the searches simple appears to bring in more search results. I'm starting to wonder if there is a problem at my end because I appear to have skipped 0.5.9; I am yet to see an update message. After the update I noticed search hits and upload counts reset. Thus instead of overall I guess it's now a per session which is more appropriate. I noticed Advanced Sharing - Watched Directories with 0.5.8, something I had not noticed previously. I apparently have ten directories watched for file changes. Negative Tree (Files which are explicitly not shared): I notice there's directories listed that I'm also supposedly sharing. At least two of them only have one kind of file so there was no reason not to share anything from those folders and makes me wonder why they should be listed in the negative tree. If certificates have been produced and you wish to adjust the name of the file, how difficult is it to make changes without polluting (creating a mismatch with) the certificate or removing and replacing the certificate? AFAIK changing the file name (not id tag name) of a file should not change the hash of a file, but the certificate is a different kettle of fish. |
| ||||
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
| ||||
Quote:
Quote:
The certificates folder is a little confusing when you have many. Since I certified all simultaneously there was no time/date indicator either to give a hint. I was not enthusiastic about opening up over 1k of certificates to find several dozen. So I started them from scratch. Unless a file has been changed I presume the certificate would be identical to the original in any case (with exception of date and time listed within.) |
| |