I am a user of <a href="http://www.freedom.net>Freedom</a>, who'd like to be able to use gnotella through the Freedom servers. The problem is, Freedom, for user security, limits the ports that are open to a handful, (http, telnet, mail, and irc).

What's the chances of a Gnotella varient with tunneling?

Huh?

Cyclocide, it's just someone showing off their message formatting trick in the forum.

Actually, it didn't work the way I intended. HTML is on, so I figured on adding a link to the service I was proudly claiming, (from a dark corner so my face wouldn't show.)

The service I TRIED to note was www.freedom.net.

The reason for the post was to ask for full HTTP and Telnet tunneling to make Gnotella compatible with the somewhat restrictive elements of the Freedom network.

The reason for this request is that Freedom obscures my backtrail, (like anonymiser, only better), and I'd like to use Gnotella with that level of anonymity. Unfortunately, Freedom also blocks almost all the ports except HTTP, Telnet, basic IRC, those used by mail and outgoing news. This is a defense against trojan horses, but also restricts me from taking part in certain internet activities.

I wasn't trying to show off, only use a feature that I thought available, to best effect. (Better than trying to adequately explain the Freedom network when it is so adequately covered on it's own page.)

hey nobody is freedom a good program? I was thinking about getting it, but before I do was curious to here from a person who uses it.