Gnutella Forums  

Go Back   Gnutella Forums > Current Gnutella Client Forums > NapShare (Cross-platform)
Register FAQ The Twelve Commandments Members List Calendar Arcade Find the Best VPN Today's Posts

NapShare (Cross-platform) Download Napshare or Neonapster (GnucDNA 1.1.1.6) now
A fully automated MUTE Network P2P client made to run 24/7 unattended. Take a nap while it does the work! Supply a list of keywords and it will download overnight, also sharing whatever it gets. Runs natively on Linux, will also run on Windows. Napshare mute p2p file share peer anonymous.


View Poll Results: Are GUI network servers dumb?
Yes. A real Gnutella server would be good. 4 50.00%
Maybe, but OK for a cross-platform program. 0 0%
NO, I like the current design. I don't wan't it running unless I'm logged in anyhow. 1 12.50%
Don't care, as long as it works. 2 25.00%
I'm not a programmer and am not sure what you are talking about. 1 12.50%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 8. You may not vote on this poll

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #3 (permalink)  
Old March 21st, 2002
Unregistered
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Smile I agree and disagree, but for different reasons

I agree that it would be nice to have a gnutella client which consists of a daemon and (a) front-end(s).

But I don't see that it matters architecturally. As long as the client is multithreaded enough that the GUI doesn't slow the network response down, then it is perfectly valid to have a single program.

However, for CONVENIENCE I would LOVE a daemon which would launch with linux, detect when my ppp0 interface is up (dialup) and start sharing files and retrieving downloads I have specified either explicitly (file hash is known) or implicitly (search criteria given eg grep for filename, minimum bitrate, length of song).

It should have controllers built into the frontend that would let me easily turn sharing off etc, for when I really need all my limited bandwidth for something other than filesharing.

This architecture would help some people who have a firewall, in that the frontend could connect from a different server (ie one protected by firewall) than the daemon, which could be running in a DMZ, on the firewall or separate machine.

HTTP HTML sounds like the best controller interface for this to me.
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How change Language? I'm too dumb to know where I should post! To dumb to see Stickys railroadhoney Open Discussion topics 8 October 11th, 2006 02:27 PM
New Design Idea. kjdenison New Feature Requests 0 July 29th, 2005 12:50 AM
Qtella Documentation/Design ?? GnutellaNewbie Qtella (Linux/Unix) 0 October 12th, 2002 08:21 AM
good design macg Open Discussion topics 3 July 21st, 2002 02:43 PM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:57 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.

Copyright © 2020 Gnutella Forums.
All Rights Reserved.