![]() |
|
Register | FAQ | The Twelve Commandments | Members List | Calendar | Arcade | Find the Best VPN | Today's Posts | Search |
New Feature Requests Your idea for a cool new feature. Or, a LimeWire annoyance that has to get changed. |
View Poll Results: Which hashing scheme would you prefer? | |||
Hashing takes 1 minute with 100% CPU use | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | 5 | 15.63% |
Hashing takes 2 minutes with 50% CPU use | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | 27 | 84.38% |
Voters: 32. You may not vote on this poll |
| LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| |||
![]() Sometimes my computer crawls, cause I have 1GB sized files in my shares. The GUI becomes unusable, and I get impatient cause my other procs are affected, so I have no choice but to kill -9. Might this be caused by not threading out the hash process? I think I will just have to not share my files till this is resolved. If everyone had to do this, it would be a great loss for P2P. With complete naivite' I will say that it appears as though the hash indexing mechanism is not optimized for/with multithreading. -dch Last edited by dcharlequin; November 11th, 2002 at 01:33 PM. |
| |
![]() | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Library hashing | joeyjoe | BearShare Open Discussion | 3 | April 13th, 2006 06:36 AM |
Hashing Files | thunt | Open Discussion topics | 1 | February 27th, 2005 09:40 PM |
Hashing indicator | Treatid | New Feature Requests | 0 | October 22nd, 2002 04:56 AM |
Hashing | Unregistered | New Feature Requests | 3 | July 18th, 2002 03:01 AM |
Signing Files, but not quite Hashing..? | NiGHTSFTP | New Feature Requests | 26 | May 9th, 2002 04:06 PM |