|
| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | The Twelve Commandments | Members List | Calendar | Arcade | Find the Best VPN | Today's Posts | Search |
| New Feature Requests Your idea for a cool new feature. Or, a LimeWire annoyance that has to get changed. |
| View Poll Results: Which hashing scheme would you prefer? | |||
| Hashing takes 1 minute with 100% CPU use |     | 5 | 15.63% |
| Hashing takes 2 minutes with 50% CPU use |    | 27 | 84.38% |
| Voters: 32. You may not vote on this poll | |||
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
December 23rd, 2002
| |||
| |||
 More to my tastes would be to allow the user to choose, as one option defiantly won't fit everyone. In my case, I'm running LimeWire on a machine that sits between my LAN and the internet (proxy server), and that's basically all it does. I'm sharing 40+ GB of data, and whenever it has to hash a file (median size is 160MB), it takes a long time... Longer than I would like. Worse, I've noticed that if the file is in the middle of the share directory structure, it will seems to stop searches from finding files further down in the directory structure (RedHat 7.3). I wouldn't mind being able to flip a toggle, or slide a slider between 33% and 100%. I'd even go so far as to suggest 33-50% highlights in black, 50-75% in green and 76-100% in red. Last edited by salemgman; December 23rd, 2002 at 01:02 PM.  |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Library hashing | joeyjoe | BearShare Open Discussion | 3 | April 13th, 2006 06:36 AM |
| Hashing Files | thunt | Open Discussion topics | 1 | February 27th, 2005 09:40 PM |
| Hashing indicator | Treatid | New Feature Requests | 0 | October 22nd, 2002 04:56 AM |
| Hashing | Unregistered | New Feature Requests | 3 | July 18th, 2002 03:01 AM |
| Signing Files, but not quite Hashing..? | NiGHTSFTP | New Feature Requests | 26 | May 9th, 2002 04:06 PM |
Threaded Mode
