Gnutella Forums  

Go Back   Gnutella Forums > Current Gnutella Client Forums > LimeWire+WireShare (Cross-platform) > New Feature Requests
Register FAQ The Twelve Commandments Members List Calendar Arcade Find the Best VPN Today's Posts

New Feature Requests Your idea for a cool new feature. Or, a LimeWire annoyance that has to get changed.


View Poll Results: Which hashing scheme would you prefer?
Hashing takes 1 minute with 100% CPU use 5 15.63%
Hashing takes 2 minutes with 50% CPU use 27 84.38%
Voters: 32. You may not vote on this poll

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #17 (permalink)  
Old July 12th, 2003
Novicius
 
Join Date: July 12th, 2003
Posts: 2
[KOR]sungsuha is flying high
Default Re: Simple is always best

Quote:
Originally posted by LeeWare
but Personally, I think that the hashing feature is fine in its current implementation. I do agree however that there should be some type of progress indicator-indicating the file that is currently being hashed and its percentage of completion. Perhaps there should be a message indicating that files are being prepared for sharing. I have a particularly useful recommendation for CPU utilization and file-hashing:

1. Set to default hashing to 50% of the CPU utilization.
2. Create an option in the configurations menu that allows a person to change-on-the-fly the speed in which the hashing is done.


The first option allows you to satisfy the users who are happy with the current implementation and "Out of the box" configuration would support this implementation.

The second option, would give users such as myself the ability to allocate 100% of my CPU utilization to hashing. because I run several servants and the files can range in size from 1 MB to 400 MB in size and these files are stored on a network file server-- hashing can take hours.

Hope this helps.
I Agree With LeeWare And Believe there Should be options to change the hashing priority rather that a pre-defined rate.
But As David Said

Quote:
Originally posted by David91
The more choices you give the user, the steeper the appearance of the learning curve and the greater the need for proper documentation to explain the whole system. I favour leaving this aspect alone. Hashing is often quite slow because I rarely have Limewire standing alone but once you learn not to mess with it once it has started, I just get on with other things until it has finished. I don't think this aspect is broke enough to need fixing.
It Could Confuse the users, So how about This :
1. The hashing priority is selected as the way it currently is. But you can select the hash priority to be higher and a short description about the priorty you selected would appear So people can make a informed decision
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Library hashing joeyjoe BearShare Open Discussion 3 April 13th, 2006 06:36 AM
Hashing Files thunt Open Discussion topics 1 February 27th, 2005 09:40 PM
Hashing indicator Treatid New Feature Requests 0 October 22nd, 2002 04:56 AM
Hashing Unregistered New Feature Requests 3 July 18th, 2002 03:01 AM
Signing Files, but not quite Hashing..? NiGHTSFTP New Feature Requests 26 May 9th, 2002 04:06 PM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:19 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.

Copyright © 2020 Gnutella Forums.
All Rights Reserved.