Gnutella Forums

Gnutella Forums (https://www.gnutellaforums.com/)
-   Open Discussion topics (https://www.gnutellaforums.com/open-discussion-topics/)
-   -   Users of older versions must upgrade!! (https://www.gnutellaforums.com/open-discussion-topics/17784-users-older-versions-must-upgrade.html)

jbartlet April 2nd, 2003 06:45 PM

Very disappointed
 
I upgraded, and silly me! I expected better performance. A search that previously gave me 200+ results now gives me a whopping 30, and none of them are legitimate. There is no place that I can adjust the number of connections. I seem to only have three or four, and all are completely worthless. I've been a big supporter (paid and everything) of Limewire, but this upgrade has rendered it useless. Very disappointing indeed. Anybody know a good Mac client?

trap_jaw April 3rd, 2003 06:56 AM

The new version improved the average number of search results (especially for rare content) significantly. But it also now limits the number of search results. You might have to refine your search (making it more exact by adding keywords for example) to get more results.

bubba April 9th, 2003 10:13 PM

"trap_jaw The new version improved the average number of search results (especially for rare content) significantly. "

but in a different thread you said.....

"However it is very likely that a search will return more results if it is really popular."

So which is it?

Don't get me wrong I really like Limewire, but I seem to have taken a big hit since I upgraded from 2.8.6.

I used to leave my machines on the network all the time because the requeiry feature did always find the files (sometimes it took a couple days, but I always got the file). I can't believe you took that away. This one change alone seems to have made the product useless. That and not being able to configure the number of connections.

trap_jaw April 10th, 2003 12:40 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by bubba
"trap_jaw The new version improved the average number of search results (especially for rare content) significantly. "

but in a different thread you said.....

"However it is very likely that a search will return more results if it is really popular."

So which is it?

I don't see a contradiction, so I'd say both. Rare files can be found more easily. The number of search results is now limited by the ultrapeers you are connected to but searches for popular content return more results than they should (the result limit is at 240 results atm but you might still get some 400 or 500 results).

Quote:

Don't get me wrong I really like Limewire, but I seem to have taken a big hit since I upgraded from 2.8.6.

I used to leave my machines on the network all the time because the requeiry feature did always find the files (sometimes it took a couple days, but I always got the file). I can't believe you took that away. This one change alone seems to have made the product useless. That and not being able to configure the number of connections.

Yes, but the traffic the requery feature caused was more than the network could manage. The number of searchable ultrapeers had been limited drastically so LimeWire decided to filter all requeries by all servents so manual queries could reach more ultrapeers and effectively search a bigger part of the network.

bubba April 10th, 2003 08:14 PM

let me understand....
 
Quote:

Originally posted by trap_jaw

Yes, but the traffic the requery feature caused was more than the network could manage. The number of searchable ultrapeers had been limited drastically so LimeWire decided to filter all requeries by all servents so manual queries could reach more ultrapeers and effectively search a bigger part of the network.

But if you've limited the number of ultrapeers I can connect too (now 3 instead of user defined), didn't my search results become just as limited, but now I can't auto-retry?

I'm realy not trying to be a butt about this, but I can't leave my computer on to just find things, AND my result lists are smaller. I could live without the retry if I always found (and downloaded) what I was after on the first search. But that still isn't the case. My search results are smaller and it doesn't retry. This seems to be a step backwards to me.

I'm guessing though if I understand everything that has been said (on a couple of different boards) that if EVERYONE was on 2.9.x then life would be perfect and we would all get great results. But is it really realistic to expect everyone to upgrade?

trap_jaw April 11th, 2003 01:06 AM

Your theoretical network horizon (the number of hosts you could reach if your searches weren't ever dropped by other ultrapeers) has always been greater than the actual network size, - even if you would connect only to one ultrapeer you should (in theory) be able to search the whole gnutella network. The problem is that the network is overloaded and that there are many freeloaders.

Pro Fools August 21st, 2003 10:21 PM

STUPID FUCKIN FILES
 
KNOW WHAT I HATE???

STUPID ****ING PEOPLE CALLING **** SOMETHING IT'S NOT.

OR LIKE, WHEN THEY CALL CALL IT PHOTOSHOP AND AND IT'S BRITNEY SPEARS PORN.
I REMEMBER THE FIRST TIME I SAW A FILE NAMED "NINE INCH NAILS WITH DAVID BOWIE (PINK FLOYD COVER) CONFORTABLY NUBM"

TURNS OUT THE FILE WAS NOT WHAT IT SAID AND NINE INCH NAILS NEVER EVEN DID A PINK FLOYD SONG WITH DAVID BOWIE.

AND MACROMEDIA IS VIRTUAL PC, AND VIRTUAL PC IS VIRTUAL GIRL.

AND YOU KNOOOWWW IT'S NOT FOTOSHOP WHEN THE FILE IS 2,000 KB

I THINK THIS IS THE BIGGEST ISSUE OVER ALL IN FILE SHARING. AND I AM GOING TO TAKE TIME OUT OF MY DAY TO SPAM THIS ALL OVER THIS FORUM, BECAUSE I FEEL IN MY HEART THAT EVERYONE NEEDS TO HEAR IT.

unklefester65 October 11th, 2003 02:41 AM

Update???
 
Okay, I understand your reasons for telling us to update, but the program stopped working as well as the older ones. If you have problems with the software and cannot provide fixes, "Why am I paying for them?"..If it aint broke, DON'T FIX IT!!!:confused:

kitbar44diqt December 19th, 2003 01:08 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by KenRay53
Hi all,

FYI

I have paid for three versions of Limewire Pro upgrades, within a year (ya, I keep losing that magic upgrade thingy), so I figure that my dues are paid up in that respect. I sometimes write Shareware and do believe in paying for software that works.

Recently after a Win98 crash, I said "the heck with it" and installed Win XP as my operating system. In the install process, my second hard drive (my goof, the one with the backups) got destroyed, along with all of my mp3 files.

Without my magic 'Limewire upgrade cookie' (or whatever the heck it is), I just decided to just use the free Limewire version. I also got tired of paying for a beta product that changes versions every few months.

I now use Norton Firewall 2003 and Win XP Home edition:

I have the Norton Firewall set to block ads.

The free version if Limewire (2.7.11) works just fine and I do not get any annoying ads at the bottom of the screen.

I have almost two weeks, so far, with XP/LW2.7.11, lots of downloads, no complaints.


Ken

You cannot remember your email address? That is what you need to download Limewire, the emaill address you gave them when you purchased it.

sleepey January 1st, 2004 06:43 PM

that last post was a bit starnje and i know what that guy means about miss named stuf but who can be assed to spam and spaming is bad


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:33 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.

Copyright © 2020 Gnutella Forums.
All Rights Reserved.