![]() |
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | The Twelve Commandments | Members List | Calendar | Arcade | Find the Best VPN | Today's Posts | Search |
| Open Discussion topics Discuss the time of day, whatever you want to. This is the hangout area. If you have LimeWire problems, post them here too. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
So what is LimeUDP ?
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
udp enabled LW's? LW is using a new UDP crawler that more accurately measures netsize.
Last edited by stief; November 6th, 2004 at 06:10 AM. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Ya, LW merged the two crawlers. The UDP crawler mostly report LWs because other clients aren't responding to the UDP crawl. I think the total host count is LW UDP crawl (takes 5 minutes) + LW tcp crawl (50 minutes) minus the duplicates IPs/2 and that make the new gnutella total.
Ciao
__________________
Liens d'intérêt /Links of interest: Gnutellaforums en français /The House's rules you have to respect / First search the forum, then create a thread / Free software alternatives! - Logiciels alternatifs gratuits!/ |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
That's true. For a number of reasons, it is not possible to crawl a network like Gnutella completely via TCP if your resources are limited, that's why LimeWire implemented an UDP crawler message a while ago. The ability to use UDP pings for crawling hosts has finally been added to the official crawler.
I still don't quite see, how LimeWire is calculating the total number of hosts, though, because: unique leaves + ultrapeer count > total host count. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Of the LimeUDP hosts 4% are non-LimeWire according to my own crawl. Most of them are BearShare ultrapeers and LimeWire leaves but there are also a good number of GnucDNA hosts among them.
|
![]() |
|
|