![]() |
|
Register | FAQ | The Twelve Commandments | Members List | Calendar | Arcade | Find the Best VPN | Today's Posts | Search |
XoloX Feature Request Missing something? Let us know. XoloX has been discontinued. We highly recommend you use an actively developed client instead. |
View Poll Results: What is your most wanted feature for XoloX? | |||
Get rid of the freezes | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | 5 | 17.86% |
Include metadata (MP3 bitrate) | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | 6 | 21.43% |
Chat between users | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | 0 | 0% |
More default extensions | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | 0 | 0% |
Advanced options/statistics for nerds | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | 8 | 28.57% |
I'm crazy, I wanna help programming | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | 2 | 7.14% |
XoloX T-Shirts =) | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | 1 | 3.57% |
Something else... (describe) | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | 4 | 14.29% |
I'm K*ltus, I hate XoloX, you will be assimilated, restistance is futile! | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | 2 | 7.14% |
Voters: 28. You may not vote on this poll |
| LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| |||
![]() I'm sorry you don't agree Moak - I've made a quick pass through the board the last few days, and I've found you to be one of the most intelligable posters here. I'm not oppose to metadata - I'm oppose to parsing of only specific metadata directly related to trading in a media that has already been demonstrated as a Bad Thing(tm) to traffic in. It all boils down to: Is the client's primary purpose to trade in copyrighted materials? Napster was. It was (effectively) shut down. (My hope is) Xolox isn't. It won't be (effectively) shut down. Quote:
But that's not the point. A *protocol* and an *application utilizing said protocol* are distinct. An application that uses a protocol to break the law is not legal. An application that doesn't use a protocol to break the law is not (in a sane legal system) illegal. Otherwise, Napster woulda taken down TCP/IP as well. Now *that* would truly suck. Napster was crushed. Why? Becuase it catered to the distribution of copyrighted materials. Now let's take a look at Gnutella. The Gnutella network, by its nature, isn't specific to any single type of content. Ergo, it can be argued that its a general file sharing protocol that doesn't distinguish between the types of data present, copyrightable or not. It is no different then an open file share on a network. Or, more accurately, no different then HTTP, except it has a distributed DNS system tailored to indexing data rather then data-centers. However, as soon as you add advanced functionality for a particular type of medium, you are in essence proposing that is an important, and possibly primary, function. Now, to provide bitrate information means that Xolox, in addition to providing standard file sharing, is going out of it's way to make it easier to share music. Thus, it goes out of it's way to provided *enhanced* functionality towards the distribution of copyrighted materials. Now, I'm not even sure if the "general file sharing tool" is legally in better standing then "music sharing tool". My entire statement rests on the (very weak) proposition that it is. In that case, if a Gnutella client does NOT cross the line from being a "general file sharing tool" to a (in this case) "music sharing tool", it has a legal basis to defend itself. I am sure the RIAA doesn't care about this distinction. But they aren't who I care notice it. It's the law and it's interpretation of Xolox's status that I'm concerned with. Quote:
To try and illustrate my point via useless shock value, let's say that someone creates a Gnutella client whose tailored to find kiddie porn. There is metadata floating about, which it parses to effectively aid its users in finding said kiddie porn. The metadata in-and-of-itself isn't illegal (though the data sure as hell is). The underlying protocol isn't illegal. Yet, the application is tailored to perform an illegal function. Sure, it might be able to transfer non-kiddie porn files, but that doesn't distract from its enhanced, and arguably primary, functionality. Shall we consider it safe to assume that this program is illegal? Assuming you agree, it's not hard to make the logical comparison - both are Gnutella clients that provide enhanced functionality to aid in the transfer of files that are illegal to distribute. And this is the reason I'm leary about having bitrate information displayed. |
| |
![]() | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
not what I wanted | Dave T | Open Discussion topics | 8 | June 12th, 2006 02:36 PM |
Password feature wanted | morphmaya | New Feature Requests | 1 | July 23rd, 2005 06:37 AM |
feature request poll on xolox.nl | Unregistered | XoloX Feature Request | 2 | July 8th, 2002 10:12 AM |
wanted feature | Unregistered | XoloX Feature Request | 3 | June 28th, 2002 11:55 AM |
New Feature Wanted | Unregistered | New Feature Requests | 2 | April 3rd, 2002 09:27 AM |