![]() |
not from "my" system |
reply to zeroshadow -- Yes, and also when you made the post, (the original one 3 months ago) LimeWire was a lot less popular than it is now. Quote:
Kirby [IMG]http://**************.com/ms/kirbykore/images/kirbywave.gif[/IMG] |
1 Attachment(s) Here are some statistics I acomulated: I used modified Gnucleus to count unique IP's who responded to my queries. I did a LOT of queries, so I think I reached almost every IP in my horizon who shared any file. LimeWire 1540 BearShare 748 Swapnut 614 Gnotella 120 Gnucleus 84 Unrecognized 28 Xolox 26 Mactella 5 Gnut 5 Gtk-gnutella 2 Total 3172 |
timur 97 Did you intentionally leave those search tabs up, or was that for amusement value only puddytat, now residing at little chortling on the farm lol |
xolox |
Quote:
Need a job? |
Quote:
(Before Morpheus 1.8.2.0 was released) 75 % of the hosts I saw were LimeWire nodes. I find th number of CNET/SourceForge downloads a far better indicator for the popularity of a client. Number of Downloads per week: Morpheus: 420,973 (52%) LimeWire (including clones): 169,576 (21%) BearShare: 139,744 (17%) Xolox: 34,923 (4%) QtraxMax: 18,788 (2%) Gnucleus: 18,220 (2%) SwapNut: 2,597 (0%) Swapper: 1,597 (0%) MyNapster: 1,549 (0%) |
Quote:
So this would be a good indication of programmers that suck and have to keep releasing new versions all the time. There are other ways to increase the download numbers if you are keeping score to try to "win" the downloads contest. |
Quote:
|
where's xolox on the vote? |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:45 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2020 Gnutella Forums.
All Rights Reserved.