Gnutella Forums

Gnutella Forums (https://www.gnutellaforums.com/)
-   New Feature Requests (https://www.gnutellaforums.com/new-feature-requests/)
-   -   Two things. (https://www.gnutellaforums.com/new-feature-requests/39042-two-things.html)

NarutoBoy June 9th, 2005 04:58 PM

Two things.
 
1. I think when you upload a file, it should be sent to the LimeWire's server, preventing a download that 'needs more sources'.

2. LimeWire should be able to Burn CD's, it would make things soo much simpler..

Sorry.. 3 things..

3. LimeWire should be able to determine your connection speed.. Some people are like modem speed but say they are T3..

Linuxhippy June 9th, 2005 10:28 PM

Hmm...
 
1.) There is no LimeWire server, servers are always evil since they can be easily shut down.

2.) Programs that were designed to do everything always failed since they got bloated and buggy.
Limewire is a very good p2p program, not a media player and not a cd-burner.

lg Clemens

NarutoBoy June 11th, 2005 01:06 PM

Well.. it already is a Media Player because it plays the music you download.. It would be nice if it could burn CD's.. I guess your right about the server thing too...

kc0rkx_finch June 20th, 2005 10:21 AM

I totally agree on the detection of speed dude

Only A Hobo June 20th, 2005 01:43 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by NarutoBoy
Well.. it already is a Media Player because it plays the music you download.. It would be nice if it could burn CD's..
I have tried to listen with the Limewire Audio player. The sound was horrid and any number of other, better players can be chosen as default. Limewire should concentrate efforts on improving an excellent application, and not adding things on that are well produced elsewhere and reasonably easy to hook up to.

I too agree about the speed ... but have a sneaky feeling that some people with good speeds say they have modems ..... no idea why <G>

I_Have_No_Account June 20th, 2005 03:58 PM

I won't take LimeWire seriously before it's able to brew coffee at the very least. Isn't it written in Java after all?

Bubba_Gump June 23rd, 2005 06:45 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Only A Hobo
I too agree about the speed ... but have a sneaky feeling that some people with good speeds say they have modems ..... no idea why <G>
You're not imagining things. I hate when people do that. It's to scare off people from downloading from them to free up bandwidth.

LW could easilly "rate" your connection speed by constantly analysing your up/down-load rate while you are online and then reporting it as a numeric value, then you'd know what a users "true speed" is and how long a download will take (a very busy T3 can take longer than an idle modem).

kc0rkx_finch June 23rd, 2005 12:14 PM

Instead of speed (dsl/cable,t3,t1) it could be reported as a numeric ping value instead. There is no way to lie on that really b/c LW would have to automatically assert it.

I_Have_No_Account June 23rd, 2005 12:48 PM

I give you a hint: Bandwidth and round-trip-time are completely different parameters. Both dependent on the involved hosts and the current network load. So the "ping" is fairly useless.

Greasy June 27th, 2005 06:57 PM

I dont care about the speed thing. I try the download, if the speed sucks, I cancel, If it's good, I keep dling


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:27 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.

Copyright © 2020 Gnutella Forums.
All Rights Reserved.