Gnutella Forums  

Go Back   Gnutella Forums > Current Gnutella Client Forums > LimeWire+WireShare (Cross-platform) > Open Discussion topics
Register FAQ The Twelve Commandments Members List Calendar Arcade Find the Best VPN Today's Posts

Open Discussion topics Discuss the time of day, whatever you want to. This is the hangout area. If you have LimeWire problems, post them here too.


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21 (permalink)  
Old April 2nd, 2003
Novicius
 
Join Date: April 2nd, 2003
Posts: 1
jbartlet is flying high
Default Very disappointed

I upgraded, and silly me! I expected better performance. A search that previously gave me 200+ results now gives me a whopping 30, and none of them are legitimate. There is no place that I can adjust the number of connections. I seem to only have three or four, and all are completely worthless. I've been a big supporter (paid and everything) of Limewire, but this upgrade has rendered it useless. Very disappointing indeed. Anybody know a good Mac client?
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old April 3rd, 2003
Distinguished Member
 
Join Date: September 21st, 2002
Location: Aachen
Posts: 733
trap_jaw is flying high
Default

The new version improved the average number of search results (especially for rare content) significantly. But it also now limits the number of search results. You might have to refine your search (making it more exact by adding keywords for example) to get more results.
__________________
Morgens ess ich Cornflakes und abends ess ich Brot
Und wenn ich lang genug gelebt hab, dann sterb ich und bin tot

--Fischmob
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old April 9th, 2003
bubba
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"trap_jaw The new version improved the average number of search results (especially for rare content) significantly. "

but in a different thread you said.....

"However it is very likely that a search will return more results if it is really popular."

So which is it?

Don't get me wrong I really like Limewire, but I seem to have taken a big hit since I upgraded from 2.8.6.

I used to leave my machines on the network all the time because the requeiry feature did always find the files (sometimes it took a couple days, but I always got the file). I can't believe you took that away. This one change alone seems to have made the product useless. That and not being able to configure the number of connections.
Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old April 10th, 2003
Distinguished Member
 
Join Date: September 21st, 2002
Location: Aachen
Posts: 733
trap_jaw is flying high
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by bubba
"trap_jaw The new version improved the average number of search results (especially for rare content) significantly. "

but in a different thread you said.....

"However it is very likely that a search will return more results if it is really popular."

So which is it?
I don't see a contradiction, so I'd say both. Rare files can be found more easily. The number of search results is now limited by the ultrapeers you are connected to but searches for popular content return more results than they should (the result limit is at 240 results atm but you might still get some 400 or 500 results).

Quote:
Don't get me wrong I really like Limewire, but I seem to have taken a big hit since I upgraded from 2.8.6.

I used to leave my machines on the network all the time because the requeiry feature did always find the files (sometimes it took a couple days, but I always got the file). I can't believe you took that away. This one change alone seems to have made the product useless. That and not being able to configure the number of connections.
Yes, but the traffic the requery feature caused was more than the network could manage. The number of searchable ultrapeers had been limited drastically so LimeWire decided to filter all requeries by all servents so manual queries could reach more ultrapeers and effectively search a bigger part of the network.
__________________
Morgens ess ich Cornflakes und abends ess ich Brot
Und wenn ich lang genug gelebt hab, dann sterb ich und bin tot

--Fischmob
Reply With Quote
  #25 (permalink)  
Old April 10th, 2003
Novicius
 
Join Date: April 9th, 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 1
bubba is flying high
Default let me understand....

Quote:
Originally posted by trap_jaw

Yes, but the traffic the requery feature caused was more than the network could manage. The number of searchable ultrapeers had been limited drastically so LimeWire decided to filter all requeries by all servents so manual queries could reach more ultrapeers and effectively search a bigger part of the network.
But if you've limited the number of ultrapeers I can connect too (now 3 instead of user defined), didn't my search results become just as limited, but now I can't auto-retry?

I'm realy not trying to be a butt about this, but I can't leave my computer on to just find things, AND my result lists are smaller. I could live without the retry if I always found (and downloaded) what I was after on the first search. But that still isn't the case. My search results are smaller and it doesn't retry. This seems to be a step backwards to me.

I'm guessing though if I understand everything that has been said (on a couple of different boards) that if EVERYONE was on 2.9.x then life would be perfect and we would all get great results. But is it really realistic to expect everyone to upgrade?
Reply With Quote
  #26 (permalink)  
Old April 11th, 2003
Distinguished Member
 
Join Date: September 21st, 2002
Location: Aachen
Posts: 733
trap_jaw is flying high
Default

Your theoretical network horizon (the number of hosts you could reach if your searches weren't ever dropped by other ultrapeers) has always been greater than the actual network size, - even if you would connect only to one ultrapeer you should (in theory) be able to search the whole gnutella network. The problem is that the network is overloaded and that there are many freeloaders.
__________________
Morgens ess ich Cornflakes und abends ess ich Brot
Und wenn ich lang genug gelebt hab, dann sterb ich und bin tot

--Fischmob
Reply With Quote
  #27 (permalink)  
Old August 21st, 2003
Disciple
 
Join Date: August 20th, 2003
Posts: 14
Pro Fools is flying high
Default STUPID ****IN FILES

KNOW WHAT I HATE???

STUPID ****ING PEOPLE CALLING **** SOMETHING IT'S NOT.

OR LIKE, WHEN THEY CALL CALL IT PHOTOSHOP AND AND IT'S BRITNEY SPEARS PORN.
I REMEMBER THE FIRST TIME I SAW A FILE NAMED "NINE INCH NAILS WITH DAVID BOWIE (PINK FLOYD COVER) CONFORTABLY NUBM"

TURNS OUT THE FILE WAS NOT WHAT IT SAID AND NINE INCH NAILS NEVER EVEN DID A PINK FLOYD SONG WITH DAVID BOWIE.

AND MACROMEDIA IS VIRTUAL PC, AND VIRTUAL PC IS VIRTUAL GIRL.

AND YOU KNOOOWWW IT'S NOT FOTOSHOP WHEN THE FILE IS 2,000 KB

I THINK THIS IS THE BIGGEST ISSUE OVER ALL IN FILE SHARING. AND I AM GOING TO TAKE TIME OUT OF MY DAY TO SPAM THIS ALL OVER THIS FORUM, BECAUSE I FEEL IN MY HEART THAT EVERYONE NEEDS TO HEAR IT.
Reply With Quote
  #28 (permalink)  
Old October 11th, 2003
Novicius
 
Join Date: October 11th, 2003
Location: District of Columbia
Posts: 2
unklefester65 is flying high
Thumbs down Update???

Okay, I understand your reasons for telling us to update, but the program stopped working as well as the older ones. If you have problems with the software and cannot provide fixes, "Why am I paying for them?"..If it aint broke, DON'T FIX IT!!!
Reply With Quote
  #29 (permalink)  
Old December 19th, 2003
kitbar44diqt
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by KenRay53
Hi all,

FYI

I have paid for three versions of Limewire Pro upgrades, within a year (ya, I keep losing that magic upgrade thingy), so I figure that my dues are paid up in that respect. I sometimes write Shareware and do believe in paying for software that works.

Recently after a Win98 crash, I said "the heck with it" and installed Win XP as my operating system. In the install process, my second hard drive (my goof, the one with the backups) got destroyed, along with all of my mp3 files.

Without my magic 'Limewire upgrade cookie' (or whatever the heck it is), I just decided to just use the free Limewire version. I also got tired of paying for a beta product that changes versions every few months.

I now use Norton Firewall 2003 and Win XP Home edition:

I have the Norton Firewall set to block ads.

The free version if Limewire (2.7.11) works just fine and I do not get any annoying ads at the bottom of the screen.

I have almost two weeks, so far, with XP/LW2.7.11, lots of downloads, no complaints.


Ken
You cannot remember your email address? That is what you need to download Limewire, the emaill address you gave them when you purchased it.
Reply With Quote
  #30 (permalink)  
Old January 1st, 2004
Gnutella Jewel
 
Join Date: January 1st, 2004
Location: uk
Posts: 81
sleepey is flying high
Default

that last post was a bit starnje and i know what that guy means about miss named stuf but who can be assed to spam and spaming is bad
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
older versions of bearshare? colbyd BearShare Open Discussion 13 September 3rd, 2006 11:57 AM
Any older limewire versions available? Mikey77577 Open Discussion topics 14 October 21st, 2005 11:10 PM
Users Of Older Versions Must Upgrade! afisk Connection Problems 29 January 13th, 2005 08:23 PM
older versions? 2.0 weak. Unregistered General Mac Support 2 December 31st, 2001 08:50 PM
Where to get older versions of LimeWire Unregistered Open Discussion topics 0 November 14th, 2001 05:26 PM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.

Copyright © 2020 Gnutella Forums.
All Rights Reserved.