Bearshare 2 block Xolox

Xenomorph · #11 (**permalink**) March 7th, 2002

i just located all the HTTP header info in XoloX

GNUTELLA CONNECT/0.4
get /get/
HTTP/1.0
User-Agent: www.XoloX.nl
Referer: Gnutella

it would not be hard for me to change that to something totally different.

i could also check BearShare's connection info and possibly mimic it for each release they do. (no promisses though- it might not be possible)

i could change that stuff, and release a 1.16 client of both my Xenomorph dot Net version, and Zeropaid (if they want me to)...

cultiv8r · #12 (**permalink**) March 8th, 2002

BS Blocks *all* v0.4 connections, so that would mean you'd have to connect with Xolox to a Gnutella deamon or something similar. Just FYI, I'll continue to support 0.4.

Morgwen · #13 (**permalink**) March 8th, 2002

Yes,

I think all clients will support 0.4, perhaps Limewire not...

Morgwen

Xenomorph · #14 (**permalink**) March 10th, 2002

Quote:

Originally posted by Unregistered
What you want to do is look for the hex 0D 0A end of line characters and just make them come after the hex 20 (space) so that it's a blank user agent line.
Screw vinnie, he can't control gnutella anymore cause morpheus gnucleus took over.
Now we have a open source major gnutella client, suck eggs vinnie!

0.4 connection uses 0A 0A (\n\n)

06. connection uses 0D 0A (\r\n)

there was only 0A 0A in XoloX.

ive tried different changes in the connection string, and i cant get XoloX to connect any after making the changes.

Xenomorph · #15 (**permalink**) March 10th, 2002

here are the connection strings used by Gnutella clients:

Connecting Version 0.4 :

GNUTELLA CONNECT/0.4\n\n

GNUTELLA OK\n\n

Connecting Version 0.6:

GNUTELLA CONNECT/0.6\r\n
User-Agent: Program Name v1.0\r\n
\r\n

GNUTELLA/0.6 200 OK\r\n
User-Agent: Program Name v1.0\r\n
\r\n

GNUTELLA/0.6 200 OK\r\n
\r\n

permalink · #16 (**permalink**) March 10th, 2002

or better yet, how do we block 0.6 connections?

Morgwen · #17 (**permalink**) March 12th, 2002

Bearshare is blocking "ALL" other clients... their hostcaches only accept "OWN" bearshare nodes!

More input!

http://www.gnutellaforums.com/showth...8237#post28237

Morgwen

CycloCide · #18 (**permalink**) March 18th, 2002

Quote:

Originally posted by Bullet
CycloCide

I remember you saying on these forums a while ago that if one Gnutella client actively blocks another Gnutella client then Gnutelliums would no longer continue to host or support the blocking client in question.Is this still the case?
I'm sure that Gnutelliums/Gnutella Forums still hold Xolox in high regard because for one thing this (Xolox)forum is still here despite Xolox being officially discontinued a good while ago.

Bullet

We're no longer supporting XoloX.

permalink · #19 (**permalink**) March 28th, 2002

dear vinnie,
f' you
enough said

if xolox sux so bad why is it alive and kicking?
why is it's undevelpoing *** doin alright raw?
why not imitate xolox instead of eliminating xolox?
unless this internet thingy becomes a proprietary network maybe we should keep it open?
bearshare has deemed xolox the ******.
write better code not exculsionary code.
innovate otherwise open your mouth n masterbate

permalink · #20 (**permalink**) March 29th, 2002

use this and block back
http://opensourcep2p.sf.net

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Block host should block them form uploading too	Sleepless	New Feature Requests	0	February 13th, 2006 06:47 PM
how to block bearshare?	Galefury	Host Connections	0	November 17th, 2005 12:32 PM
BS forums on bearshare.com ? - A NEW Temporary Address For BearShare.net !!!	kevver	BearShare Open Discussion	6	July 13th, 2005 08:09 PM
What is the client called ?!?! Xolox or XoloX.	mort4	Support: General	1	August 8th, 2002 08:20 PM
XoloX Down, BearShare Up?	HanoverF	User Experience	2	November 3rd, 2001 03:54 PM