What Paco is writing is not in conflict with any protocol. That has only to do with how the local client handles the local filenaming during and after a download. Nothing to do with the protocol.

What I am writing is not compliant of course. It was meant as a joking thought around what could be done if we still were on day one and the protocol was not yet defined. But we are not.

Selecting hosts from the top of a sorted list is a step in the right direction. Great stuff!

:Kjell